What does the quarter hour and daily graphs look like?
Modulation time, it should be 4096 90%++ what is the breakdown?
Update to the latest release?
Can you measure this another way? Maybe your testing method/device is
flawed? Test with a PC behind the mikrotik...
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021, 10:59 PM
I've checked the light levels, auto negotiation is off, and I've also
enabled flow control - all with no change in the behavior.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:32 PM TJ Trout wrote:
> turn auto neg off, try flow control on and off. Check your light levels on
> all 4 sfp's and make sure they are withi
turn auto neg off, try flow control on and off. Check your light levels on
all 4 sfp's and make sure they are within spec, if not clean the fibers or
add an attenuator(s)
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 12:20 PM Josh Baird wrote:
> FWIW - we have a WTM4200 with a CCR2004 on one end and don't have that
>
FWIW - we have a WTM4200 with a CCR2004 on one end and don't have that
issue.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 3:13 PM Joe Novak wrote:
> Test with anything other than a CCR2004. I'd be willing to bet on it being
> the problem.
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:05 PM Jason McKemie <
> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroa
Test with anything other than a CCR2004. I'd be willing to bet on it being
the problem.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 2:05 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> Are you familiar with the Aviat radios? I cannot seem to find anywhere to
> set flow control on the ethernet interfac
Are you familiar with the Aviat radios? I cannot seem to find anywhere to
set flow control on the ethernet interfaces.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Colin Stanners wrote:
> Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
> link? What model of MT router?
>
> On Thu,
They're both brand new SFPs provided by Aviat. I guess if they have
terrible quality control that could be the issue. That solution would make
a lot more sense to me if it were just one end seeing the issues. I may
have to at least attempt it if nothing else works, however.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021
I have not tried that as of yet. One end is a CCR1009, the other is a
CCR2004. I could try Flow Control on one end to see if it makes a
difference.
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Colin Stanners wrote:
> Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
> link? What mo
replace the sfp on both radios
or use the copper port to rule out the latency coming from the rf
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021 at 1:25 PM Colin Stanners wrote:
> Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
> link? What model of MT router?
>
> On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 1:20 PM J
Have you tried Flow Control off/on, on both devices, at one end's Ethernet
link? What model of MT router?
On Thu, Aug 26, 2021, 1:20 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> I'm having an issue where about 3-8% of packets going through a WTM4200
> link are seeing a 1-10ms spi
The guys in Midland found some in Dallas...
Thanks...
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, 4:05 PM TJ Trout wrote:
> I see some on fleebay
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, 3:03 PM TJ Trout wrote:
>
>> What is it
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, 1:04 PM Jaime Solorza
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Does anyone know where we can get som
I see some on fleebay
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, 3:03 PM TJ Trout wrote:
> What is it
>
> On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, 1:04 PM Jaime Solorza
> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone know where we can get some of these?
>> Thanks,
>> Jaime
>> --
>> AF mailing list
>> AF@af.afmug.com
>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo
What is it
On Sat, Jun 19, 2021, 1:04 PM Jaime Solorza
wrote:
> Does anyone know where we can get some of these?
> Thanks,
> Jaime
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
--
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/lis
are we on same firmware? WTM4200 / CKV *2.10.0(15.5134)*
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:58 AM Josh Baird wrote:
> There isn't a solution that I know of. The SNMP daemon on Aviat needs
> some work. If you go to the device sub-menu (button with three dots) and
> click "Capture," I suspect you'll see
There isn't a solution that I know of. The SNMP daemon on Aviat needs some
work. If you go to the device sub-menu (button with three dots) and click
"Capture," I suspect you'll see errors about the SNMP agent becoming
unresponsive (or out of memory, etc). This is what causes the
sensors/ports/de
It's 5 minutes. didn't change that AFAIK.
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 10:49 AM Steve Jones
wrote:
> did you set your polling to more than default? Im just curious why I
> dont see the issue
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:45 AM Josh Baird wrote:
>
>> The symptoms are that sensors, etc disappear becau
What's the solution? We poll every 5 min..
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 10:45 AM Josh Baird wrote:
> The symptoms are that sensors, etc disappear because the SNMP agent on the
> radio flakes out during Libre's discovery and/or polling runs. I'm pretty
> familiar with this as I'm the one who wrote the
did you set your polling to more than default? Im just curious why I
dont see the issue
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:45 AM Josh Baird wrote:
> The symptoms are that sensors, etc disappear because the SNMP agent on the
> radio flakes out during Libre's discovery and/or polling runs. I'm pretty
> fa
I dont know what help i could offer, my knowledge of libre is just
following the install guide. if the community string is set and correct it
should work
[image: image.png]
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:42 AM Sam Lambie wrote:
> Interfaces aren't importing, so no useable information is shown, I get
The symptoms are that sensors, etc disappear because the SNMP agent on the
radio flakes out during Libre's discovery and/or polling runs. I'm pretty
familiar with this as I'm the one who wrote the Aviat support for LibreNMS.
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 12:32 PM Steve Jones
wrote:
> my libre instance
Interfaces aren't importing, so no useable information is shown, I get
generic device..
Steve, you wouldn't feel like a quick teamviewer session would ya?
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 10:33 AM Steve Jones
wrote:
> my libre instance is all default, ive never seen this issue on 7 aviat
> links. what are
my libre instance is all default, ive never seen this issue on 7 aviat
links. what are the symptoms?
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:28 AM Josh Baird wrote:
> Still waiting for an OS update that includes better SNMP support.
> Currently, the SNMP agent on these radios croaks after ~15 or so
> consecut
Still waiting for an OS update that includes better SNMP support.
Currently, the SNMP agent on these radios croaks after ~15 or so
consecutive requests in a short period of time. This is why Libre doesn't
get along with Aviat. The Libre poller is rather aggressive.
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 12:00 P
ours are in librenms no issues, no RSL though, we monitor that from
powercode snmp
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:04 AM Nate Burke wrote:
> I only have a single Aviat link right now, but it's happily polling
> everything I want in MRTG. Are you talking about trying to import the MIB
> into another p
I only have a single Aviat link right now, but it's happily polling
everything I want in MRTG. Are you talking about trying to import the
MIB into another program?
On 5/3/2021 10:58 AM, Sam Lambie wrote:
We use librenms and the Aviat gear that we have been installing
doesn't like libre or the
i never measured the exact, but at least half that, 3 saf hops
doesnt exceed 1ms. Its relatively negligible ti WISPs but it adds up. we
will have a couple points that will traverse 6 aviats (3ms) 2 Mimosa b11
garbage and 1 saf link to get to bandwidth, so it adds up. but that price
point makes some
We just put up a WTM4200 link and latency across the link is consistently
0.5ms (or less).
What are you expecting?
On Wed, Jan 20, 2021 at 12:25 AM Steve Jones
wrote:
> They have some more latency than saf, but (as a major saf fanboy this
> pains me) their pricepoint is worth the hit
>
> On Tu
They have some more latency than saf, but (as a major saf fanboy this
pains me) their pricepoint is worth the hit
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, 9:53 PM Darin Steffl wrote:
> Yes it's 730+ Mbps full duplex per 80mhz channel. With XPIC, you have two
> channels so roughly 1460 Mbps full duplex for the lin
Yes it's 730+ Mbps full duplex per 80mhz channel. With XPIC, you have two
channels so roughly 1460 Mbps full duplex for the link. These things rock.
We love our WTM4200
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:48 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> I think Ken from Aviat just answered
Yes - 1.4Gbps.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 10:48 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> I think Ken from Aviat just answered my question. It looks like it is
> about 1.4 Gbps FDX, so that is what I would expect.
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:35 PM Steve Jones
> wrote:
>
>> In
I think Ken from Aviat just answered my question. It looks like it is
about 1.4 Gbps FDX, so that is what I would expect.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:35 PM Steve Jones
wrote:
> In what?
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, 8:55 PM Jason McKemie <
> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
>
>> Those of you
In what?
On Tue, Jan 19, 2021, 8:55 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> Those of you that have WTM 4200 links deployed in 11GHz, what are you
> seeing throughput-wise in an 80MHz XPIC channel? It looks like around
> 730mbps each way from what I can tell, but that doesn'
il I realized you probably meant processor.
>>> That takes the typo/autocorrect prize for the day.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> From: AF On Behalf Of Jesse Dupont
>>> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:32 PM
>>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Gr
20 at 9:57 PM Ken Hohhof wrote:
>> That had me totally confused until I realized you probably meant processor.
>> That takes the typo/autocorrect prize for the day.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: AF On Behalf Of Jesse Dupont
>> Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:32
he day.
>
>
>
> *From:* AF *On Behalf Of *Jesse Dupont
> *Sent:* Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:32 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aviat Mib file
>
>
>
> Their management professor does seem very lacking.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
&
That had me totally confused until I realized you probably meant processor.
That takes the typo/autocorrect prize for the day.
From: AF On Behalf Of Jesse Dupont
Sent: Thursday, September 3, 2020 8:32 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat Mib file
Their
Their management professor does seem very lacking.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 7:16 PM, Josh Baird wrote:
>
>
> Be careful.. the WTM radios don't handle lots of SNMP queries very well.
> They will start rejecting requests after 15+ concurrent requests in a short
> period of ti
Be careful.. the WTM radios don't handle lots of SNMP queries very well.
They will start rejecting requests after 15+ concurrent requests in a short
period of time.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020 at 4:24 PM Steve Jones
wrote:
> Im not finding a mib file anywhere for the wtm4200 is there one?
> --
> AF mail
What'd you do to get on his shit list?
He seems to be a pretty patient guy from working with him myself.
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020, 6:45 PM Steve Jones wrote:
> I'm on Ken's shitlist plus hes busy with fires so I was s leaving the
> aviat folks alone for minor stuff
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2020, 5:04 PM J
I'm on Ken's shitlist plus hes busy with fires so I was s leaving the aviat
folks alone for minor stuff
On Thu, Sep 3, 2020, 5:04 PM Jesse Dupont
wrote:
> I just emailed Ken Ruppel and he sent it to me.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Sep 3, 2020, at 1:24 PM, Steve Jones
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
I just emailed Ken Ruppel and he sent it to me.
Sent from my iPhone
> On Sep 3, 2020, at 1:24 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
>
>
> Im not finding a mib file anywhere for the wtm4200 is there one?
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
--
AF
If an electrician doesn't care enough to check their work with an actual
voltmeter then I'd suggest that perhaps switching to one which does might
be a good idea.
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 8:37 PM Seth Mattinen wrote:
> On 8/23/20 5:24 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
> > We had one farm where we got the 3 p
On 8/23/20 5:24 PM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
We had one farm where we got the 3 phases, one wild, but no neutral.
Luckily when we asked Phoenix Contact, they said we could connect L and
N of the power supply we were using (actually a TRIO UPS) to L1 and L2.
Ungrounded, corner grounded, and center
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat power supplies and exploding power strips
Well, any electrician should know that some three phase circuits have a wild
leg.
Sent from my iPhone
On Aug 23, 2020, at 3:25 PM, Steve Jones mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
ta connection. So two of the legs should be
>> 120 to ground. You just got unlucky with the breaker placement.
>>
>> From: ch...@wbmfg.com
>> Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2020 12:32 PM
>> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat power supp
Farm Microwave Users Group
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Aviat power supplies and exploding power strips
>
> I can see that three phase breaker right above your single leg breaker.
> Check all three. I am sure you will find one you can use if there is an
> open slot on that phase.
>
>
Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat power supplies and exploding power strips
I can see that three phase breaker right above your single leg breaker. Check
all three. I am sure you will find one you can use if there is an open slot on
that phase.
From: Steve Jones
Sent
I can see that three phase breaker right above your single leg breaker. Check
all three. I am sure you will find one you can use if there is an open slot on
that phase.
From: Steve Jones
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2020 12:12 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat
.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Radabaugh
Sent: Sunday, August 23, 2020 10:53 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat power supplies and exploding power strips
Get a meter and verify voltage line to neutral, line to ground, neutral to
ground. If you have
Spot fucking on, chuck. I was up all night worrying about this shit, even
to the point the varying metals and floating box was making a massive
murder capacitor.
Turns out there's 210v and all our existing PSU are rated to 240v, the
meanwells are switch selected, and this power strip happenned to
Get a meter and verify voltage line to neutral, line to ground, neutral to
ground. If you have access to the panel check the 240 line to line, and
verify that the two legs are ~120 to both ground and neutral. If all those
check out you should be good. There are some other truly weird creat
I had something similar happen. An electrician picked the wild leg of a three
phase to connect a new receptacle. We had about 208 volts on it. Of course
only discovered after the damage. I have seen neutrals get damaged and
connected to the other side of the box giving you 220. Did you check
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Daniel White"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 12:51:33 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle
Considering how little 11GHz spectrum you have availa
Get while the getting is good... it’s the American Way.
From: Daniel White
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2020 11:51 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle
Considering how little 11GHz spectrum you have available in Chicago land
already
it should stay the same?
>
>
>
> -
> Mike Hammett
> Intelligent Computing Solutions
>
> Midwest Internet Exchange
>
> The Brothers WISP
>
>
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tim Hardy"
> To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group&
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Hardy"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:24:30 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle
All I meant was that 112 MHz bandwidth is an “ETSI” configuration. There’s
nothing in Part 101 th
Fries with that?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: AF On Behalf Of Mike Hammett
> Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:10 AM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle
>
> Recommendations for changing tha
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Hohhof"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 9:00:08 AM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave
Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, June 11, 2020 8:10 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle
Recommendations for changing that rule?
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers
mug.com > On Behalf Of Daniel White
Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:10 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group < af@af.afmug.com >
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle
I would be surprised if any dual-core radio didn't support 4+0... although it
may no
> From: AF mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> On Behalf
> Of Daniel White
> Sent: Wednesday, June 10, 2020 8:10 AM
> To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave multi-carrier battle
>
> I would be surpris
We are running the Navigators in 18Ghz with sub-carriers. Restricted to
512QAM in current firmware. We are getting just over 2Gbps.
Adam
From: AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, June 3, 2020 8:27 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subjec
ot;
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:54:13 PM
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave 11GHz
But Part 101 is probably the least dumb set of rules that WISPs have to deal
with. It’s about the only time dealing with government regulations where I feel
like I have a seat at the adult table. We sho
Mike Hammett
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:39 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Bridgewave 11GHz
That's dumb.
-
Mike Hammett
<http://www.ics-il.com/> Intelligent Computing Solutions
<https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL>
<htt
When operating that way, do both channels need to be the same size, or can
you mix a 40mhz and an 80mhz, for example? I got the impression with the
Bridgewaves that would both need to be the same size (i.e 80mhz+80mhz).
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:43 PM wrote:
> Matthew - yes we do.
>
> Thanks,
>
swisp.com/>
> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp>
>
>
> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg>
> --------------
> *From: *"Tim Hardy"
> *To: *"AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
> *Sent: *Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:19:32 PM
&
Matthew - yes we do.
Thanks,
Joe Schraml
VP Sales Operations & Marketing
SIAE Microelettronica, Inc.
+1 (408) 832-4884
joseph.schr...@siaemic.com
www.siaemic.com
>>> Mathew Howard 6/4/2020 8:20 AM >>>
Does Siae have the capability of running two channels per core, like
That's dumb.
-
Mike Hammett
Intelligent Computing Solutions
Midwest Internet Exchange
The Brothers WISP
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Hardy"
To: "AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group"
Sent: Thursday, June 4, 2020 12:19:32 PM
Subject: Re: [A
And, this is exactly what I have been discussing in this thread. “In instances
where a customer can get the FCC to license wider than 80 MHz channels (11 GHz
& 18 GHz), we can unlock the modems to provide up to 112 MHz bandwidth.”
Let’s be clear on this. The only way to “get the FCC to license
Our ALFOPlus2 radio is true dual-carrier radio capable of up to 2x 112 MHz
channels. In instances where a customer can get the FCC to license wider than
80 MHz channels (11 GHz & 18 GHz), we can unlock the modems to provide up to
112 MHz bandwidth. With 4096QAM, this yields just over 2 Gbps ful
I don't know what specific bonding features Aviat has, but you can
technically do that with any radios... it's just a question of where and
how you have to do the bonding. You are also able to do two radios on the
same dish with the appropriate couplers, etc. with most 11ghz radios.
On Thu, Jun 4
If you need more throughput in 11ghz can't you license two separate links
for 11ghz and install two separate AVIAT radios and then the radios can
bond both links together? I thought that was a feature that AVIAT had.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:21 AM Mathew Howard wrote:
> Does Siae have the capab
Does Siae have the capability of running two channels per core, like was
discussed earlier on the Bridgewave and Aviat radios?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:49 AM Tim Hardy wrote:
> Should be easy enough to check to ensure that you have two (2) dual core
> radios each transmitting a discrete frequenc
Should be easy enough to check to ensure that you have two (2) dual core radios
each transmitting a discrete frequency 60 MHz apart from one another. Anything
else would lead one to believe that they actually are just using their ETSI
configuration (112 MHz) within the 120 MHz block. Seems sus
I’m not sure details other than I verified multiple times 120Mhz of actual
usage and the speed matched. Our frequency coordinator worked with them on the
rest...
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Tim Hardy wrote:
>
> Just confirming that this is actually
Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one CCDP at 80
MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the two transmit
frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require couplers and
associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any attempt
11Ghz is 80MHz per channel, plus another 40Mhz= 120Mhz (two channels per
polarity). But the channels have to be stacked and available.
Ignore the promos and prices. Tell him what price you need to be at and he will
try to make it happen.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 3, 20
Have they come down in price recently? Last time I checked they were
considerably higher than both Bridgewave and Aviat.
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Jon Langeler wrote:
> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all
> the same
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies,
Jon,
I'm pretty dumb with this stuff, is this possibly two descrete 60mhz
channels per TX side?
TJ
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jon Langeler
wrote:
> 11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX.
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ
11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX.
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ Trout wrote:
>
>
> What band can you do 120mhz in?
>
>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler
>> wrote:
>> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz
What band can you do 120mhz in?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler
wrote:
> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all
> the same
>
> Jon Langeler
> Michwave Technologies, Inc.
>
>
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie <
> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.
SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all the
same
Jon Langeler
Michwave Technologies, Inc.
> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie
> wrote:
>
> Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two.
>
>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout wrote:
>
Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two.
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout wrote:
> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's called
> a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird wrote:
>
>> The W
aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's called a2c
or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird wrote:
> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The Bridgewave
> has some other magic.
>
> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020
The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The Bridgewave
has some other magic.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core version
> is - 4300? I think the power on the
<http://www.unwiredltd.com/> www.UnwiredLtd.com
Desk: 510-868-1614 x100
Mobile: 510-207-
<mailto:pkr...@unwiredltd.com> pkr...@unwiredltd.com
From: AF On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2020 9:41 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFM
I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core version
is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably in part due
to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator.
On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird wrote:
> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher over
I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput (~3Gbps if
you have the channels available).
The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each capable of
~1.4Gbps.
On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie <
j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote:
> Does anyone
2020 12:30 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat vs Cambium 820c
I'm not even sure why anyone is still buying 820C radios with the pricing that
Aviat is running.
On Sunday, March 29, 2020, Kurt Fankhauser
mailto:lists.wavel...@gmail.
Voice in the back of my head says that sounds like me back when I bought
Trango, and again when I bought Exalt G2. But Aviat does appear to have a nice
radio.
From: AF On Behalf Of Jason McKemie
Sent: Monday, March 30, 2020 12:30 AM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG
I'm not even sure why anyone is still buying 820C radios with the pricing
that Aviat is running.
On Sunday, March 29, 2020, Kurt Fankhauser wrote:
> Looking at the specs it appears Aviat is a better radio. 4096 quam vs 2048
> quam. (1.4gbps vs 1.2gbps) SFP+ ports vs SFP ports. So why is Cambium
I lo e the aviat direct model. I like that I can sit up at 3am and build
out my quote, know what's in stock, etc and just order it. Assuming the fcc
side of things is good.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020, 7:54 PM Kurt Fankhauser
wrote:
> Just priced a full link is all. Yeah Aviat full license out the door
Just priced a full link is all. Yeah Aviat full license out the door with
antennas, cables, power supplies was half of Cambium.
On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 8:31 PM Ken Hohhof wrote:
> Are you just pricing qty=1? If not, are you just figuring 20% off MSRP,
> or have you asked your Cambium sales mana
Are you just pricing qty=1? If not, are you just figuring 20% off MSRP, or
have you asked your Cambium sales manager for better pricing? Also have you
included all accessories and license keys in your BOM? Not saying that will
change your price comparison, just some things to make sure it’s
Just sayin I got new things to sell :-D
photograph
Daniel White
Co-Founder & Managing Director of Operations
phone: +1 (702) 470-2766
direct:+1 (702) 470-2770
Steve Jones wrote on 11/19/19 22:06:
Yep, youre the guy, youre salesmanship is why your word is solid gold
to me, literally made
Got our followup today. This is exactly the sales process i like. We are
going to to a GUI demo, get set up with our account. maybe RTFM, probably
not. pick a link and put it in. Unless I come across some major
skullduggery, this is the perfect solution for our builds. The savings is
such that buyi
it can go that low?
On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 8:38 AM Chuck McCown wrote:
> But no writing if your BAC is less than 0.1
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Nov 20, 2019, at 3:16 AM, Lewis Bergman
> wrote:
>
>
> You really should consider writing a novel.
>
> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 10:20 PM Steve Jone
But no writing if your BAC is less than 0.1
Sent from my iPhone
> On Nov 20, 2019, at 3:16 AM, Lewis Bergman wrote:
>
>
> You really should consider writing a novel.
>
>> On Tue, Nov 19, 2019, 10:20 PM Steve Jones wrote:
>> Thats the motherfucker, kens his name. Its funny you guys mention
Aviat is being used extensively here on the AWIN sites.
On 11/19/19 9:47 PM, Steve Jones wrote:
What do you old hippie degenerates know about these folks? I did a dot
I cross T on SAF vs Cambium gear post so I could keep getting my SAF
gear and this Aviat fella pissed on my parade. This is an
: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Date: Tuesday, November 19, 2019 at 11:51 PM
To: AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Aviat
[EXTERNAL]
I love SAF and probably always will. Lots of great memories working there.
Steve I think I was even part of helping convince you on that first
1 - 100 of 122 matches
Mail list logo
