I don't know what specific bonding features Aviat has, but you can technically do that with any radios... it's just a question of where and how you have to do the bonding. You are also able to do two radios on the same dish with the appropriate couplers, etc. with most 11ghz radios.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 10:38 AM Kurt Fankhauser <lists.wavel...@gmail.com> wrote: > If you need more throughput in 11ghz can't you license two separate links > for 11ghz and install two separate AVIAT radios and then the radios can > bond both links together? I thought that was a feature that AVIAT had. > > On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:21 AM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Does Siae have the capability of running two channels per core, like was >> discussed earlier on the Bridgewave and Aviat radios? >> >> On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:49 AM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Should be easy enough to check to ensure that you have two (2) dual core >>> radios each transmitting a discrete frequency 60 MHz apart from one >>> another. Anything else would lead one to believe that they actually are >>> just using their ETSI configuration (112 MHz) within the 120 MHz block. >>> Seems suspicious when two sets of radios are about the same cost as one. >>> >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> I’m not sure details other than I verified multiple times 120Mhz of >>> actual usage and the speed matched. Our frequency coordinator worked with >>> them on the rest... >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one >>> CCDP at 80 MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the >>> two transmit frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require >>> couplers and associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any >>> attempt to stack an 80 and a 40 to get a 120 MHz block in order to “cover” >>> the band for an ETSI 112 MHz bandwidth radio configuration would be >>> strictly illegal in North America, and any single transmitter bandwidth >>> greater than 80 MHz bandwidth (11 GHz) is likewise illegal. >>> >>> On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:28 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>> 11Ghz is 80MHz per channel, plus another 40Mhz= 120Mhz (two channels per >>> polarity). But the channels have to be stacked and available. >>> Ignore the promos and prices. Tell him what price you need to be at and >>> he will try to make it happen. >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:36 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Jon, >>> >>> I'm pretty dumb with this stuff, is this possibly two descrete 60mhz >>> channels per TX side? >>> >>> TJ >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> 11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX. >>>> >>>> Jon Langeler >>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>> >>>> >>>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> What band can you do 120mhz in? >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically >>>>> all the same >>>>> >>>>> Jon Langeler >>>>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie < >>>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two. >>>>> >>>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's >>>>>> called a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100 >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The >>>>>>> Bridgewave has some other magic. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie < >>>>>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core >>>>>>>> version is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably >>>>>>>> in >>>>>>>> part due to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput >>>>>>>>> (~3Gbps if you have the channels available). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each >>>>>>>>> capable of ~1.4Gbps. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie < >>>>>>>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat >>>>>>>>>> WTM4200 vs Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> -Jason >>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
