Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one CCDP at 80 MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the two transmit frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require couplers and associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any attempt to stack an 80 and a 40 to get a 120 MHz block in order to “cover” the band for an ETSI 112 MHz bandwidth radio configuration would be strictly illegal in North America, and any single transmitter bandwidth greater than 80 MHz bandwidth (11 GHz) is likewise illegal.
> On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:28 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> wrote: > > 11Ghz is 80MHz per channel, plus another 40Mhz= 120Mhz (two channels per > polarity). But the channels have to be stacked and available. > Ignore the promos and prices. Tell him what price you need to be at and he > will try to make it happen. > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > >> On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:36 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >> >> >> Jon, >> >> I'm pretty dumb with this stuff, is this possibly two descrete 60mhz >> channels per TX side? >> >> TJ >> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net >> <mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote: >> 11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com >>> <mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> What band can you do 120mhz in? >>> >>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net >>> <mailto:jon-ispli...@michwave.net>> wrote: >>> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all the >>> same >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie >>>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com >>>> <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two. >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com >>>> <mailto:t...@voltbb.com>> wrote: >>>> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's called >>>> a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:joshba...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The Bridgewave >>>> has some other magic. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie >>>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com >>>> <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>> wrote: >>>> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core version >>>> is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably in part due >>>> to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator. >>>> >>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com >>>> <mailto:joshba...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput (~3Gbps if >>>> you have the channels available). >>>> >>>> The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each capable of >>>> ~1.4Gbps. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie >>>> <j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com >>>> <mailto:j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com>> wrote: >>>> Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat WTM4200 vs >>>> Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding. >>>> >>>> -Jason >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>>> -- >>>> AF mailing list >>>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com> >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> <http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
