Does Siae have the capability of running two channels per core, like was discussed earlier on the Bridgewave and Aviat radios?
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 8:49 AM Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote: > Should be easy enough to check to ensure that you have two (2) dual core > radios each transmitting a discrete frequency 60 MHz apart from one > another. Anything else would lead one to believe that they actually are > just using their ETSI configuration (112 MHz) within the 120 MHz block. > Seems suspicious when two sets of radios are about the same cost as one. > > > On Jun 4, 2020, at 8:04 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote: > > I’m not sure details other than I verified multiple times 120Mhz of actual > usage and the speed matched. Our frequency coordinator worked with them on > the rest... > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Jun 4, 2020, at 7:59 AM, Tim Hardy <thardy...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Just confirming that this is actually two (2) dual core radios - one CCDP > at 80 MHz bandwidth and the other CCDP at 40 MHz bandwidth with the two > transmit frequencies separated by 60 MHz - correct? This will require > couplers and associated losses on both ends (approximately 7 dB). Any > attempt to stack an 80 and a 40 to get a 120 MHz block in order to “cover” > the band for an ETSI 112 MHz bandwidth radio configuration would be > strictly illegal in North America, and any single transmitter bandwidth > greater than 80 MHz bandwidth (11 GHz) is likewise illegal. > > On Jun 4, 2020, at 12:28 AM, Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote: > > 11Ghz is 80MHz per channel, plus another 40Mhz= 120Mhz (two channels per > polarity). But the channels have to be stacked and available. > Ignore the promos and prices. Tell him what price you need to be at and he > will try to make it happen. > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > > > On Jun 3, 2020, at 10:36 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: > > > Jon, > > I'm pretty dumb with this stuff, is this possibly two descrete 60mhz > channels per TX side? > > TJ > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:40 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> > wrote: > >> 11Ghz...2 channels in FCC assignment -similar- to AF11FX. >> >> Jon Langeler >> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >> >> >> On Jun 3, 2020, at 8:08 PM, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >> >> >> What band can you do 120mhz in? >> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 5:04 PM Jon Langeler <jon-ispli...@michwave.net> >> wrote: >> >>> SIAE just licensed me 2Gbps links in 120Mhz x2. Price was basically all >>> the same >>> >>> Jon Langeler >>> Michwave Technologies, Inc. >>> >>> >>> On Jun 3, 2020, at 6:16 PM, Jason McKemie < >>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>> >>> Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two. >>> >>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>> >>>> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's called >>>> a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The >>>>> Bridgewave has some other magic. >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie < >>>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core >>>>>> version is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably in >>>>>> part due to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput >>>>>>> (~3Gbps if you have the channels available). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each >>>>>>> capable of ~1.4Gbps. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie < >>>>>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat >>>>>>>> WTM4200 vs Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -Jason >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>> AF mailing list >>>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com > > > -- > AF mailing list > AF@af.afmug.com > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
