Yeah, the throughput is pretty comparable between the two. On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> wrote:
> aviat can do the same with dual channels on a single radio, it's called > a2c or active two channel, we use it on the wtm4100 > > On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:38 PM Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The WTM4200 is dual core which is why it can do 1.4Gbps. The Bridgewave >> has some other magic. >> >> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 12:41 PM Jason McKemie < >> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >> >>> I may have gotten the Aviat model wrong, whatever their dual core >>> version is - 4300? I think the power on the Aviat is better, probably in >>> part due to the field replaceable diplexer in the Navigator. >>> >>> On Wednesday, June 3, 2020, Josh Baird <joshba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> I think the Navigator DT will have a higher overall throughput (~3Gbps >>>> if you have the channels available). >>>> >>>> The WTM4200 and the Navigator ST are a better comparison - each >>>> capable of ~1.4Gbps. >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jun 3, 2020 at 11:27 AM Jason McKemie < >>>> j.mcke...@veloxinetbroadband.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Does anyone have any experience with the two of these (Aviat WTM4200 >>>>> vs Navigator Dual)? I'm having a hard time deciding. >>>>> >>>>> -Jason >>>>> -- >>>>> AF mailing list >>>>> AF@af.afmug.com >>>>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>>>> >>>> -- >>> AF mailing list >>> AF@af.afmug.com >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >>> >> -- >> AF mailing list >> AF@af.afmug.com >> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com >> >
-- AF mailing list AF@af.afmug.com http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
