I want to setup one client schedule which only starts at
Tue/Wed/Thu/Fri/Sat. How can I do it? TIA.
Thanks Andy. Unfortunately I am still sitting on TSM 5.1/5.2.
The customer needs the backup for weekday not for weekend. But for
Monday I can only be allowed to start backup at 2:00am on Tuesday, so
does Friday, I do it on Saturday 2:00am.
Maybe there is a workaround, but haven't gotten a change
Yes, he definitely needs both. One is TDP for Exchange Server, one is
for TSM Client. Both of them must be registed on TSM Server.
On Apr 1, 2005 9:48 PM, Stapleton, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Joe Crnjanski
> >If I have
don't think that this is correct.
> If I'm backing up only exchange DB, I don't have to register TSM client on
> server. I will not use TSM client.
>
> ____
>
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager on behalf of William
> Sent: Fri 4/1/2005 10
If it is JFS, the max file size is 64GB. If it is JFS2, should not be a problem
On Apr 7, 2005 12:22 PM, Stapleton, Mark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jones, Eric J
> >I have a new server running TSM 5.2.2 server with AIX 5.2.
>
Why don't you choose 3584?
On 5/6/05, Waldon, Jo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have found StorageTek libraries brilliant with all flavours of TSM on all
> flavours of OS's. Support is brilliant as well and the engineers are
> fantastic in implementing, migrating (from other libraries) and upgradin
I don't believe LTO1 drive can read LTO3 tape, but LTO3 drive can
read, not write LTO1 tape.
On 5/6/05, goc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> hi all, i'll first explain the situation and then tell you what we want do ,
> i appreciate every
> reply and help you offer
>
> TSM 5.2.4.0 on pSeries 640
> 2x
The data expired or reclamed?
On 5/7/05, Roger Deschner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simply wait a day. Patience has always fixed these for me. I don't know
> quite why, but after a day I can almost always delete these.
>
> Roger Deschner University of Illinois at Chicago [EMAIL PROTECTE
I have a strange mgmtclass problem.
1. mgmtclass definination
TSM>q mgmt STANDARD
PolicyPolicyMgmt Default Description
DomainSet Name Class Mgmt
NameName Class ?
- ---
Andy, thanks a lot. That's what I want.
On 5/11/05, Andrew Raibeck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See
>
> http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0110/1078.html
>
> this
>
> http://msgs.adsm.org/cgi-bin/get/adsm0203/706.html
>
> and this (which is ugly, the option described in the link immediately
I just checked one of TSM Server, it has 2 Media Changer:
smc0 Available 0D-08-02 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)
smc1 Available 0H-08-02 IBM 3584 Library Medium Changer (FCP)
>From TSM Server, it only defines one Media Changer:
DEFINE PATH TSMSERVER LTO3584 SRCTYPE=SERVER DESTTYPE=LIBRAR
What an excellent answer, the library is partioned for sure. My
question is: how do I know which media changer I should use for
configuration on TSM Server?
tapeutil -f /dev/smc0 elementinfo
Getting element information...
Number of Robots .. 2
First Robot Address ... 1
I am interested in this. I am planning to migrate my TSM Server on
HP-UX to AIX. Other than export/import, do I have other better choice?
During the migration, I only have 1 tape library. BTW, TSM Server is
5.2.2.
TIA
On 5/13/05, Otto Schakenbos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I would say respond to
>From your post, I would say:
1. If the TSM Client Windows Server see mt.0.0.0.4, then you have to
config the drive path on TSM Server for this storage agent as
mt.0.0.0.4, not mt0.0.0.2. On TSM Server, you define the drive as
mt.0.0.0.2 for TSM Server itself.
2. I am not sure if your STA is 5.2
thanks for updating.
On 5/16/05, Chernyaev Sergey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> Problem solved! I forget about HBA Bios. Guys some time ago upgraded QLogic
> HBA firmware, by default in BIOS option "FibreChannel Tape support" is
> "disabled". Yesterday i check HBA Bios on all wind
I would suggest you go to pSeries. That is the best platform for TSM.
I have many TSM on pSeries, one TSM 5.2 on Linux. The Linux one causes
many problems and AIX/pSeries are pretty stable. By the way, on Linux
TSM Server, I backup 2 TB every night.
On 6/1/05, Patrick Boutilier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have 36 drives.
It did happen on Linux and Windows. For sure you need to setup the
"Persistent Binding", especially for Qlogic HBA.
If you are using IBM LTO and Qlogic HBA, please checkout this link:
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com/Redbooks.nsf/RedbookAbstracts/tips0250.html
- Connection Option fr
Maybe you can do it as following:
dsmc rest "/pob/tompl/*" "/pob/restore/" -subdir=yes -quiet
-preservepath=subtree - -virtualnode=ServerA
On 6/20/05, Timothy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
>
> I am doing another restore test, we want to try using the
> virtualnodename
> this
Thanks for your contribution!
On 6/20/05, Warren, Matthew (Retail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello *SM'ers,
>
> I have been busy over the past few weeks putting together a TsmWiki
> based on the excellent QuickFscts by our own Richard Sims.
>
> The wiki is up and hosted at http://tsmwiki.com/
I have a performance issue here, any input would be greatly appreciated.
TSM Server: 5.3 on AIX 5.3
TSM Client: 5.2.3 on HP-UX B.11.11
TSM Storag Agent 5.2.3
Tape Library: IBM 3584 LTO2 with 12 drives
The backup throughput is not good.
06/17/05 06:59:51 Total number of objects inspected: 37
did you check the file systems? we met this a lot because file system
problem and end up with Server reboot.
On 6/23/05, Tim DeBolt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We have an AIX client that does a nightly scheduled incremental backup. It
> has failed the last three nights, but if we schedule it duri
great,thanks.
On 6/23/05, Sung Y Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After spending pretty good deal of time trying to gather all the select
> statements used by TSM Operational reporting.. said to myself.. you know
> there must be a better way to gather this information.. I browsed under
> c:\progra
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> William -
>
> See IBM site Technote 1200328, particularly its comments on TCP
> window size.
>
> (Those on TSM 5.3 for HP-UX should see Technotes 1193325 and 1206956
> regarding
> TCPwindowsize and performance. Again, never take defaults.)
>
>Richard Sims
>
Thanks Sung. I did not find any lanfree related issue. As I mentioned
in previous post. I changed 2 parameters:
1. resouceutilization from current 3 to 5
2. tcpwindowsize from current 128 to 63
Now the backup looks very good.
06/23/05 20:26:13 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS BEGIN
06/23/05 20:26:13 To
Now I am not sure which parameter took effect.
Another thing I am not sure is the backup file size dropped to 50GB
from more than 100GB. I will keep monitoring it and post here.
Thanks for all your help!
On 6/23/05, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Sung. I did not find an
40:13 --- SCHEDULEREC STATUS END
06/25/05 22:40:13 --- SCHEDULEREC OBJECT END 06/25/05 19:45:00
On 6/24/05, Sung Y Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Np.. Glad you were able to resolve the issue.
> Now that's pretty good backup speed.
>
> Sung
Thanks, Richard!
On 6/27/05, Mike <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2005, Richard Sims might have said:
>
> > A big FYI for AIX 5.x sites...
> >
> > I spent most of the weekend pursuing a problem in our TSM system
> > where HSM operations could not proceed. The whole AIX 5.2 system got
Hi Richard, I have a question about the file list.
For example, I have a system which as 20 million files and 5 file systems.
fs1 3 million files
fs2 4 million files
fs3 5 million files
fs4 5 million files
fs5 3 million files.
When client starts to backup, will it get whole 20 million f
Thx for the explanation and have a great weekend!!!
On 7/15/05, Allen S. Rout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ==> On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 12:09:17 -0400, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>
> > For example, I have a system which as 20 million files and 5 file syst
The best choice is increasing maximum mount point to 2.
On 2/9/06, Robert Ouzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi to All
>
> I saw this morning on a Oracle file systems backup this error:
>
> 02/08/2006 22:11:27 ANR0539W Transaction failed for session 6866 for
> node ALEPHTEST. This node has ex
In my case, because of underestimate, at the end of UDB backup session, it
failed. I would say, diskpool size should be at least larger than UDB backup
size.
On 2/10/06, Michael Garnebode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Good Morning,
>
> i have found two inquiries for the problem in adsm-l but no
Yes you can. As Andy said, you must use the original node name.
On 3/13/06, Timothy Hughes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> Thanks, Does this mean that we cannot restore a backupset to a
> different server?
>
>
> Andrew Raibeck wrote:
>
> > The SET ACCESS and -FROMNODE options do not per
I just double checked my system and it did include lanfree agent TAPE
MOUNTS. But from SUMMARY table it does not tell you which TAPE MOUNT is for
lan-free agent, and which is for TSM Server instance.
Bill
On 3/28/06, Prather, Wanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> If you have a Lan-free client,
>
I have a stranger behavior in my TSM Server ( at least to me).
TSM Server 5.3.3 on AIX 5.3, tape library 3584 with LTO3 drives.
library on AIX, it shows "tsm_barcode_len 6"
root# lsattr -El smc0
alt_pathing no Enable Alternate Pathing
Support True
debug_trace
Thanks Dave, that explains everything!
On 5/21/06, David Longo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I started a thread on this about 9 months ago.
Short summary: The "tsm barocde length" on AIX is
for LTO1 and LTO2 tapes only - note comment by that on your lsattr output.
The outout is corect, LTO1/2 w
As far as I know, once the db backup completes, the log utilization should
be clean to zero. But in the activity log, I did find it was not true. Can
anybody tell me why? Thanks in advance.
07/11/06 05:07:00 ANR0984I Process 391 for DATABASE BACKUP started in
the
B
My 3584 library missed the tsm_barcode parameter after upgraded to new
firmware on AIX 5.2. Did anybody come across it? Thanks in advance.
Old firmware 5360:
*lscfg -vpl smc0
* smc0
U7311.D20.10B16FA-P1-C02-T1-W500507630054FD01-L1 IBM 3584
Library Medium Changer (FCP)
Manufa
Thanks Richard.
On 7/12/06, Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 11, 2006, at 4:43 PM, William wrote:
> As far as I know, once the db backup completes, the log utilization
> should
> be clean to zero. But in the activity log, I did find it was not
> true. Can
>
ber Method StateTimeSent Recvd
Type
-- -- -- -- --- ---
-
1 ShMem Run 0 S7.0 K 592
Admin AIX William
tsm: TSMSERVER>q pr
ANR0944E
7/19/06, Michael Bartl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
William,
(usually) if you don't see processes or sessions using a tape R/O, the
volume is held open just during the mount retention period. But this
doesn't match the current status "IN USE"...
Try to dismount the volum
/rmt3),
> status: IN USE.
> ANR8334I 3 matches found.
>
> tsm: TSMSERVER>dismount vol K00059L3
> ANR8348E DISMOUNT VOLUME: Volume K00059L3 is not "Idle".
> ANS8001I Return code 11.
>
>
> Thanks Mike, the node removed after deleted backupset.
>
>
>
yes I did reboot the library before.
Just now after I ran the audit library, now it became normal.
Thanks,
William
On 7/19/06, Thorneycroft, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Have you restarted or run an inventory on the physical library?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dis
cellence.
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" wrote on 07/19/2006
10:21:11 AM:
> yes I did reboot the library before.
>
> Just now after I ran the audit library, now it became normal.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
> On 7/19/06, Thorneycroft, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
t; wrote on 07/19/2006
10:21:11 AM:
> yes I did reboot the library before.
>
> Just now after I ran the audit library, now it became normal.
>
> Thanks,
>
> William
>
> On 7/19/06, Thorneycroft, Doug <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Have you restarted
Production side:
TSM Server: 5.3.3 on AIX 5.3
Tape Library: 3584 with 8 LTO3 drives
DB2 database: 8.2, 1.2TB with 7 backup drives, backup time 1.2 hour
offisite copy, 2 processes, with 4 drives.
DR site:
TSM Server: 5.3.3 on AIX 5.3
Tape Library: 3584 with 4 LTO3 drives
My problem is, when I
Thanks for your reply Nick. That's the good point. I am wondering, I did not
change anything, why the first time, it used 4 drives but the second time
only used 2 drives.
On 7/28/06, Nicholas Cassimatis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Increase the number of processes used for the offsite copy. With
Does anyone know an select command or any way that can tell how much active
data a particular client has? Presently we have to run an export node of
active data with the preview option.
Bill Sherrill
Analyst International Corporation
I just received my TSM 4.1 CD's and was reading the README.SRV file. At the
very end was:
Performance Tuning for Tivoli Storage Manager
The Tivoli Storage Manager V4.1 Performance Tuning Guide will be available
on the home page. Point your web browser to this address:
http://www.tivoli.co
Works for me. You are thinking of the *SM server opening the options file
DISP=MOD, but that's usually if you do any kind of SETOPT command to make
the *SM server add that option to his DSMSERV options.
As far as I'm aware, the client doesn't open the options file for anything
other that read. I'
I'm not sure about the -OUTFILE options, but redirecting an individual
command can be done to a specified DD statement in the JCL. Here's one I've
used before:
//DSMADMC EXEC PGM=DSMADMC,
// PARM='-ID= -PASSWORD= -COMMA'
//DSCOPT DD DSN=TECHSRV.PARMLIB(DSCOPT),DISP=SHR
//DSCLANG DD DS
Why not just set the MIGPROCESS=5 when you lower the migration threshold? Do
yo find the MOVE DATA more effecient than the MIGRATION processes?
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
bbullock
Sent: Wednesday, March 21,
TSM 3.7.3.0 running on OS/390 2.9
This past weekend, the time on the mainframe was altered using the SET CLOCK
command instead of an IPL. I had the operators issue the ACCEPT DATE command
to TSM 'assuming' that the new time would take effect. WRONG!! Last night I
was checking the server and found
AIX 4.3, TSM 3.7.2.0 and an IBM 3494 library L-14 and D12 with 4-drives.
After more than 3-years, the robot/gripper in our library died. We do not
have the dual robot feature. The library manager is now configured for
online manual mode, but even though TSM processes are showing as waiting for
ta
window where you need to
be to do your tape mounts... could this be the case ? ? ? need to hit F12 ?
Dwight
-Original Message-
From: William Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 09, 2001 10:23 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: running 3494 in MANUAL mode - URGENT!! (Please?
you exactly what was replaced because
I'd
been relieved by the time the fix was worked out. I'd be interested in
knowing
what yours turns out to be (because it could happen to us if it hasn't
already... : } )
Good luck!
Kathleen
|+-------
Our shop is currently running Lotus Notes and for our remote WAN attached
Notes servers we had to go to using the TDP Agent and daily incremental
processing. This was because the amount of data to back up using the B/A
client and *.NSF files was too much to fit in the window and bandwidth. We
are
TSM 3.7.3.0 running on OS/390 2.9
Last night our automated processes to shut the system down didn't take into
account that TSM would take a few extra minutes to halt due to reclamation
running. The automation script ended up taking TCPIP and CA-TLMS and
DFSMSRmm (in warn mode) down while TSM was
After running for almost 23-hours, the LOADDB process terminated with:
ANRD PVRNTP(2536): RC 0x0 Reading cartridge block 00026776 to ddname
SYS00040.
ANR0664E LOADDB: Media not accessible in accessing data storage.
ANR1364I Input volume M00750 closed.
ANR5209I Dismounting volume M00750 (read-
We are working on a plan to upgrade from Notes to Domino and would like to
use the TDP DOmino agent. After reading the TDP User's Guide, we are a
little confused. No suprise there! :-)
In the 'Overview- Additional Considerations for Backup Strategy Selection'
on page 9, it states:
"There are man
We just started using RMM at Easter. Converted over from TLMS. Here's the
VRS definitions I use for my TSM tapes, both on and off-site. I basically
defined them like DFHSM tapes. There's a chapter in the RMM Installation and
Configuration manual on running RMM with DFHSM. The only change the TSM i
HP-UX 11.0
TSM Client 4.1 100MB-full duplex Ethernet.
TSM Server 4.1.3.0 on AIX 4.3 RS/6000 S80 with 2 Gigabit Ethernet adapters
configured as EtherChannel.
Could some one give us some tuning tips for not only the TSM client, but
HP-UX configuration settings to get optimum backup performance? We
According to the TDP for Lotus Notes manual Your exclude should be:
Exclude ?:\$NOTESDIR\mailobj.nsf\*\*
Check out the secion Step 2D: Creating an Include-Exclude list (Optional)
for all the rules.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[
Is your ARCTVEXT available? Did you code DELETIONEXIT(ARCTVEXT) in your
server options? TLMS supplies it's own version of the ARCTVEXT that you need
to use, not the IBM supplied default.
Bill Boyer
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Pa
We have a potential client that wants to backup a 1.2TB SAP database in a
3-hour window. Currently they are using Omniback and an HP SureStore library
with 10 LTO drives SCSI attached.
If we were to repace Omniback with a TSM server on the SAP server, using
those same LTO drives and TDP for SAP,
We had a problem with a newly installed 3494. One of the 6 drives showed up
DOA, and the replacement drive was configured incorrectly. Whenever TSM
called for a tape mount, the drive would fail reading the tape and the
library would eject the tape all by itself. There were messages in the
library
The TSM Client is only available for Unix System Services (USS) on the
mainframe S390. There is no 'mainframe' S390 client.
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Angela Hughes
Sent: Friday, June 15, 2001 2:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
munication but this is where I got my info. from
and previously working @ IBM we ran earlier versions
of ADSM/TSM on the mainframe.
Thanks,
Angela
--- William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The TSM Client is only available for Unix System
> Services (USS) on the
> mainframe S390. The
You could also code a SELECT command to run against the SUMMARY table. I
have created several reports in Crystal Reports from this table. For client
sessions, seems to have the same information as the accounting records, but
this table also includes server processes. I produce reports for client
a
Jeff Connor
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
Syracuse, NY
William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 06/29/2001 04:10:56 PM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
T
the
Backup (and TSM is retrying the files!) , the Number of Bytes transferred is
much higher than the Number of Bytes Backuped. And if you account the number
of
Bytes transferred, your customer wouldn't be happy !
Gerhard Wolkerstorfer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William Boyer) am 02.07.2001
Maybe because copypool tapes are reclaimed under a single process. Where as
primary pool volumes are reclaimed 1 volume at a time. Each its own process.
Just my $.02 worth.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Prathe
We had a meeting a month or so back with some Lotus consultants. The main
issue was backups of Domino. He knew nothing about backups. He wasn't aware
of many of his clients actually backing up Domino servers. He said mostly
they were configured as clusters, so why backup a backup??? But the main
t
Here's a BAT file I created to install the Web client services: This is
assuming the the nodename = computername:
REM
REM This file will install the TSM Remote Web Interface services
REM
REM First install and start the Client Acceptor service..
dsmcutil install CAD /name:"TSM Client Acceptor" /p
Somebody on the list wrote that V4.2 manuals are not available for download.
I saw several at this URL.
http://www.tivoli.com/support/public/Prodman/public_manuals/storage_mgr/admanual.htm#tarcom
Regards,
www.
___
William White
Mainframe Services Group
If this is a scheduled backup, you must specify the objects to be backed up.
Only Incremental has a default value for objects.
___
William White
Mainframe Services Group
International Computing Centre (ICC)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, you're relying on DFDSS to do your TSM recovery? The only thing you
really need is the DBBackup tape, which I would hope you're creating anyway.
All the data that 'may' be in your disk pools should also be on your
copypool tapes offsite. At your DR site, you're main goal is restores. So
you re
I would look forward to the finished product, too. Maybe
http://www.coderelief.com would be a good place to save it for the list??
Bill
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Lisa Cabanas
Sent: Tuesday, July 17, 2001 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PRO
. The fix is to start the server with the undocumented option
NOMIGRRECL which prevents migration on server startup.
___
William White
Mainframe Services Group
International Computing Centre (ICC)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm going to assume you're talking a TSM 3.7 client...
I have seen this at a client site where their idletimeout was set too low.
These second sessions you're seeing are from the RESOURCEUTILIZATION which
defaults to 2. TSM will start a session for session communications and
another for transferr
AIX 4.3.1, TSM 3.7.3.0, IBM3494, (2) IBM3590B1A
Right now I have 50 tapes in my onsite tape pool and 22 of them are in a
'Filling' state. It seems that TSM is more often selecting a scratch tape
instead of a 'Filling' tape. These 'Filling' tapes aren't reclaimed, and I
was trying to consolidate b
A co-worker of mine worked with IBM/Tivoli on this. The symptoms came during
the reclamation of the offsite copypool tapes for the DIRMC disk storage
pool. The answer he got was that reading from the disk storage pool was done
a file at a time and not buffered. They said it was because it was a ra
have vanished into the
fog of memory. Can anyone help on this?
Thanks,
www.
___
William White
Mainframe Services Group
International Computing Centre (ICC)
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- First you need to define TSM to CA-1 as an External Data Manager (EDM).
This procedure is described in the Systems Programmer book for CA-1 under
the heading of define DFHSM. Same procedure, different names.
- Install the CA-1 delivered version of the ARCTVEXT.
- In your DSMSERV options file c
How about the DISABLESCHEDS YES to the dsmserv.opt and bring up the server.
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
John Naylor
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2000 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: How to stop all Scheduled Jobs
A
No. DIRMC is used for directories in OS's that have ACL (Access Control
Lists) assigned. Like NT permissions. The WIN32 client on NT will use DIRMC
as well as the Netware clients. If the OS doesn't have ACL's associated with
the directories, then the information is kept in the TSM database only.
W
Rodney,
I got this error message when I tried to restore data using an older
version of TSM. The client was backed up at TSM 3.7.2 and I tried to
restore it using TSM 3.7.1. The is was on an NT client.
Bill Sherrill
Analyst International Corp
rh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.MARIST.EDU> on 11/2
NT 4.0 SP5
TSM Client 3.7.1.0
TSM Server 3.7.3.0 OS/390 2.9
I have several NT clients (both server and workstation) that keep loosing
their registry password that was generated from PASSWORDACCESS GENERATE.
Here's a little bit from the DSMSCHED.LOG file from one of them.
<<< Start DSMSCHED.
Another disadvantage is reclamation of the copypool for the DIRMC disk pool.
If the primary pool is a disk pool, then TSM server only reads 1
file/directory at a time during reclamation of the offsite copypool for the
DIRMC primary pool. This makes the reclamation process REAL slow! Tivoli
says 'w
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Joel Fuhrman
Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2000 2:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: DIRMC - disadvantages only?
On DIRPOOL, what is the setting for "Cache Migrated Files"?
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, William Boyer wrote:
> Another disadvantage is rec
When we made the conversion to OS/390 2.6, I actually got to talk to one of
the TSM server developers. It wasn't related to throughput, but I talked to
him about it. According to him, you won't really see a throughput
improvement so much as a reduction in TCP CPU utilization. By coding
directly to
Server: TSM 3.7.3 on OS/390 2.9
Client: TSM 3.7.2.16 on NT 4.0 SP4
TDP: TDP for Lotus Notes 2.1.9
I created a new domain for my TDP Notes nodes. Right now I have 2 nodes
defined, and 1 schedule. I have a daily script that runs and emails the
output of a Q EV * * T=CL EX=YES to me. FOr a week now,
No, event records are kept for the number of days specified in the SET
EVENTRETENTION. You can view this via Query STatus.
Turns out the previous responses described the issue. I had updated the
schedule before my Q EV report ran. It looks like updating a schedule
removes any event records for it
I am having a little problem with the last modification date not being
updated for an Access97 database residing on a Netware 4.11 server.
I had a user call up to get a .MDB file restored, but TSM showed that the
last backup date for that file was over 4-months ago. Looking at the last
modified d
If your tape management system is DFSMSrmm, insertion of tapes happens
differently than CA-1 or CA-TLMS. If the tape isn't defined to the RMM
control dataset (CDS), then RMM adds it to his CDS using the default
insertion catagory (private/scratch) defined for that library. So, to
prevent RMM from
I am running Win2K and I had TSM 4.1 client installed and was able to do all
my Crystal Reports with the ODBC driver. I upgraded to TSM 4.1.2.0 client
and followed the directions in the INSTALL.TXT for the ODBC driver. I
removed all my ODBC definitions, uninstalled TSM ODBC, rebooted and ran the
i
You need to make sure that your CHECKIN commands on each server use the
VOLRANGE parameter. When you put tapes in the 3494, they are placed in the
insertion catagory and the first 'host' to grab them get them. So you could
possibly checkin serverA's tapes in for serverB and write over good data.
en this is done does this completely discount the other tapes from being
included in the others checkin procedure.
In response to the other e-mail. Both Sun Servers can see all the drives
and they are attached through dual brocade switches.
Thanks
Alex
Wil
If you have accounting turned on, you can look in the dsmaccnt.log file.
Bill Sherrill
Analyst International
AIX 4.3
TSM 3.7.3.0
IBM 3494
3590E1A's (4)
Last weekend we added 2 addititional 3590E's to our library. We also added
more SCSI controllers to the RS/6000 to support them. Right now I have 1
SCSI controller to 1 3590E drive. Nothing is chained. In preparation for
this, I deleted all the drives fr
parameter in the UPDATE DRIVE command.
2) Delete and then re-define the drive to TSM.
Comments:
MODULES/MACROS: NONE
Problem Conclusion:
None.
-Original Message-
From: William Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2001 9:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ANR8301E
1 - 100 of 871 matches
Mail list logo
