Maybe because copypool tapes are reclaimed under a single process. Where as
primary pool volumes are reclaimed 1 volume at a time. Each its own process.
Just my $.02 worth.
Bill Boyer
DSS, Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Prather, Wanda
Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 9:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Summary table
Funny you should bring that up. I had just noticed the same thing --. I
have a 3.7.4 server and a 4.1.2 server, both on AIX. During the last week
I've reclaimed over a dozen copy pool tapes, but only ONE of them shows up
in the SUMMARY table on the 3.7.4 server, none on the 4.1.2 server. That
makes it look like a bug to me, but I haven't had time to research it.
-----Original Message-----
From: Walker, Lesley R [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 04, 2001 1:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Summary table
I've been doing some SQL queries on the summary table, to look at past
reclamation processes and drive usage.
It appears that only primary pool reclamations are actually recorded here,
there are no entries for copy-pool reclamations at all.
Is this normal?
Server is 3.7.4 on Solaris.
--
Lesley Walker
Unix Engineering, EDS New Zealand
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"I feel that there is a world market for as many as five computers"
Thomas Watson, IBM corp. - 1943
