Hi Thomas ,
I just installed 4.1.2.16 client on Netware 5.1 and setting with DSMCAD and
CADMODE is functioning without problem. What error are you getting ?
Regards
Petr
- Puvodnm zprava -
Od: "Thomas Anthon Kiel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Komu: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Odeslano: 20. cervna
Check following error message out.
How does it works??
I'am in trouble now,give me a clear answer..
Thanks in advance..
ACO3028e SQL server errors encountered. DB-LIB messages:
Because db is in use. you cannot access alone..
The file_size in the contents table is the aggregate size (if in use). If
you look at each row in the table you will see something like the
following. The 1/5, 2/5 in the AGGREGATED field indicates that 5 files
make up the aggregate, their total size is 3661 bytes.
VOLUME_NAME: C:\TSMDATA\SE
Hi TSMers,
Has there been any firmware releases which will improve this yet? We are at 0CE1 amd
atape 5.4.2. Concerns are building that we won't reach the original quoted restore
time..
Ta Muchly,
Latthew
_
Are you a Techie? Get Y
$)C
Iykim,
This isn't a lot to go by... but I suggest that
you reboot the server, make sure nothing/no one
opens the database that you are trying to restore,
then retry the restore operation.
If it still fails, you will have to find out
what process has the database open and make sure
that proc
RTFM, see below:
Nwwaitonerror
The nwwaitonerror option specifies that the client program responds in one of the
following ways, if an error occurs while exiting:
Display an error message and wait before returning to the NetWare console.
Return immediately to the NetWare console.
Note: You
We have turned Auditing on to watch access to a directory.
Nightly backups are filling our event log up.
We increased the log size but I would just like to for ADSM to ignore this
directory.
An Exclude statement has been added d:\DirectoryName\...\*.*
Any ideas..
Than
I posted this 2 days ago but saw no responses. Did it make it to the list?
Hello all,
Last week I attended the 2 day DRM class in L.A.. In one the discussions we
had it was mentioned by the instructor that the size of the recovery log
could be over the 5.5gb current limit. I questioned him on th
Well -- the problem is that I can get about an even-up swap on contract cost
on the drive change; if I'm the first customer to contract the *library*, I
get cover about half the purchase cost for the D/R site. Not happy about
that bit at all. I'm holding out until someone larger than us contracts
Yes, we saw it. I haven't heard any responses or heard anything else about it.
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/21/01 09:31AM >>>
I posted this 2 days ago but saw no responses. Did it make it to the list?
Hello all,
Last week I attended the 2 day DRM class in L.A.. In one the discussions
Hello,
we are going to migrate 400 laptops and 200 NT servers from Adsm 3.1.2.6/8
onto TSM 4.1.2. Our server will be 4.1.2 (OS/390).
Which version should we use for the Win32 client? The Tivoli support site
once showed 4.1.2.12 / 14 / 17 and 18 !
Now it has only 4.1.2.12 !
As there are so many
>We increased the log size but I would just like to for ADSM to ignore this
>directory.
>
>An Exclude statement has been added d:\DirectoryName\...\*.*
Bob - Your specification is a file-oriented specification: ADSM will
still plow through the directory. If you want a directory
excluded, i
Yes, it made it to the list. I've been anxiously awaiting a response from
someone confirming this. I am unaware of this "special fix", but we could
certainly benefit from it.
I have heard that some relief *may* be in a new release of TSM, perhaps
4.2, which I just received in the mail yesterday
I have a bunch of Windows 2000 clients (file servers) whose backups are
really dragging. My server is TSM 3.7.3 on Solaris 2.7. The clients are
running TSM v 4.1.2.12. They have 2 Xeon 700Mhz CPUs and 512 MB RAM,
100Mb NICs on a gigabit backbone. Each one of these clients has several
hundred th
Oops ... you missed 19. :-)
> Which version should we use for the Win32 client? The Tivoli support
> site once showed 4.1.2.12 / 14 / 17 and 18 ! Now it has only 4.1.2.12 !
Perhaps you are confusing the "maintenance" area of the FTP server
with the "patches" area? The patches area has all of t
One additional item on the server can cause slowness with large amount of files on
client. on server do a: q db f=d
Look for these:
Cache Hit Pct.: 98.10
Cache Wait Pct.: 0.00
These two parameters from my server should be similar. If Cache Wait is above 0 there
is a problem. If Cache Hit Pct
Explain what server version is unable to backup NT system object (the new
one) The newest server I know is 4.1.3.0, but 4.1.4 is supposed to be out
soon. Does 4.1.3 have any issue or what level does?
Jeff Bach
> -Original Message-
> From: Wayne T. Smith [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent:
The good news: I've heard that multiple versions of SYSTEM OBJECT will be
supported in a client release this year.
The bad news: Wait until you see what that does to your TSM data base!
-Original Message-
From: Wayne T. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 1
Wanda, I don't like surprises on computers. Don't keep us in suspense, what does it
do to our TSM database??
David Longo
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/21/01 11:37AM >>>
The good news: I've heard that multiple versions of SYSTEM OBJECT will be
supported in a client release this year.
The bad news:
Maybe the instructor just wanted a good eval, so he told you all something
you wanted to hear ;-)
I have heard that development was working on getting around the
limitation, but not that any special "fix" was available. I asked an
IBM'er if he had heard anything new on this, he said no and he ch
Anyone know of a good way to raise Cache Hit Pct to above 98%. I continue
to get 95.6% and I tried the performance tuning setting an still get cann't
get it above 98%. Tivoli manuals state that Cache Hi Pct should remain
above 98%.
Thanks
***EMAIL DISCLAIMER
hi all,
i have a problem:
environment:
AIX 4.3.3 with 3494 tape library and 3590E drives.
aim: migrate/update from ADSM 3.1 to TSM 4.1.3.0
road:
atape; bos.rte.install OK
install 4.1.0.0 basis
update to 4.1.3.0
$> dsmserv upgradedb
dsmadmc> reg lic for library, mgsyslan and spacemgr (yep -
Per the "Summary of Changes for Tivoli Storage Manager Version 4" section of
the "Quick Start" manual, the "Changes for Version 4 Release 2 - June 2001"
topic lists:
Maximum Size of the Recovery Log Increased
The maximum size of the recovery log is increased to 13GB.
Signi
I have a disk-based pool of 92GB with the MAXSIZEthreshold set to 700M and
the next storage pool set to my tapepool which has this parameter set to
NO LIMIT. I have a few NetWare clients that have files that >700M.
Everytime the backup hits these files on the node, the backup stops with
an ANS131
Done
-Original Message-
From: Jolley, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2001 5:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SCHEDULER ACTUAL EXECUTION TIME
Also, check the randomization percentage. I believe the default is 25. If
you want the schedule
to execute at it'
Hi Ruud,
reqs for tdp for ess for r/3 are:
* tsm server (recommended on backup server)
* tsm ba client on both servers (production and backup system)
* tsm api on both servers (production and backup system)
* tdp for r/3 on both servers (production and backup system)
* oracle server on production
Hi David,
I should not have posted that without more information, sorry.
I was referring back to a message I posted originally on June 1, with the
subject:
Issues with Win2K SYSTEM OBJECT/SYSTEM FILES backup
The problem is that each "system object" on our Win2K pro machines actually
consists of
Pl read red books performance tuning on TSM/ADSM.
I think u need to reset something .
say help reset at dsmadmc prompt to get the details.
-Original Message-
From: Dearman, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Cache Hit
you need reset the database buffer pool statistics with:
RESET BUFPOOL
:)
---
Claudio Cofré Caro
Ingeniero Especialista de Producto
S&A Consultores - Chile
Fono : +56 (2) 235-0289 ext 301
Richard, Your cache hit percentage is too low at 95.6 percent and as you
have pointed out, should be around 98 percent of above. To change the
percentage of your cache hits, increase by doubling, the size of your
BUFPOOL parameter in your dsmserv.opt file on your TSM server:
entry from my dsmserv
My Buffpoolsize is set to 65536 and SelfTunebufpoolsize is set to yes as
well. So I would assume it would tune itself to the right value. I'm
thinking maybe the reset of buffpool stattistics will help. Is resetting of
the buffpool statistics something that need to be don everyday. In order to
The selftunebufpoolsize only adjusts your bufferpool size when you run
expiration. If you are like us and only run expiration once a week it
isn't much help. Part of the selftunebufpoolsize process involves
resetting the bufpool statistics, but again this only happens when you run
expiration.
Ji
>I have a 56GB disk pool with the next pool to tape. I have a user, DB2
>Admin, that wants to back up a 125GB DB2 backup. What's the best way to
>handle this one user? If he/she backs up the file will it crash the system
>because it's bigger that the diskpool, or will it go right to tape?
That
That's curious because it resets mine. I am running v4.1.1.0 of TSM on
AIX. Maybe it has something to do with what version of TSM you are running.
Jim Sporer
At 01:23 PM 6/21/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>I run expiration everyday at 5pm but it doesn't seem to reset my bufpool
>statistics. Unless m
I think .12 is the requisite level (for the DST fix), the rest are for the
apar's they fix. BTW, I think your statement of the SysObj issue, if
correct, will make the "normal incremental" a nightmare -- I vote we stick
with the "Microsoft" way (avoid the TSM SysObj backup feature, use ntBackup
to
An FYI - TSM 4.2 will increase the limit to 13GB. Available
son from a Tivoli rep near you.
At 10:47 AM 6/21/2001 -0500, you wrote:
>Maybe the instructor just wanted a good eval, so he told you all something
>you wanted to hear ;-)
>
>I have heard that development was working on g
What we do is to put the one BIG Oracle TDP client we have into a separate
domain for BIG users with a management class that points direct to tape,
instead of the disk pool. Just remember that whenever this client backs up,
there should be a tape drive available (although if there isn't one
avail
A couple of questions first. What kind and how many tape drives are you
migrating to? What kind of disk are you using and how is it attached? I
have a seen a few sites with SSA disk pools and multiple 3590 tape drives
with a backups over a 100meg ethernet connection where migration from disk
to ta
>An FYI - TSM 4.2 will increase the limit to 13GB.
I think we're all wondering when the first voice will be heard asking
when the 13 GB limit will be increased. And I think we're all wondering
why the increase was little more than a doubling of the current limit -
which customers are already str
I've noticed some strange behavior here regarding tapes in filling status
going inactive and no longed being called upon to store more data. Here is
the whole story:
For disaster recovery tests we take a system snapshot and use this as a base
to run the test from. After the snapshot, all tapes in
My experience with hugh files that exceed the backuppool is adjusting the
high and low thresholds to a high=85 and a low=70. So far the tape migration
will start when the 85% of the storage is used and the mount point will
remain until the 70% is meet. The default of 15 timeout for the tapes will
Chris,
I guess I could have described the problem a little better. What I have is
SSA disks backed up by a 3583 LTO library w/6 drives? And this works very
well. It's when I get this DB2 backup once a week that bothers me. What I
was doing was setting the POLICY so that all data from several
Jeff Bach wrote, in part..
> Explain what server version is unable to backup NT system object (the
> new one)
... in reply to my comment ...
> > I'll admit to not understanding "system objects" and their backup and
> > restore, but providing restore of only the most recent registry backup
> > may
Roughly 35% of the time I perform an incremental backup from a Solaris
machine (v4.1.2 client) to a v4.1.3 server it goes to almost-completion
and then aborts with the following message:
Assertion failed: poolP->incSize > 0, file mempool.cpp, line 719
Through many iterations of changing the conf
Hello to all.
I am a new user. for Unix client, is there any difference in creating an
option
exclude /tmp/
vs.
exclude /tmp/*
Lin-yen Lee
S C Johnsons
What I did for my large DB2 customers was make a class which is bound to go
directly to a tape pool.
You could even do it for just that one dataset, if they bind it in their IE
file (if using an API you can make a
node just for them to use for the BIG ones.
Richard Sims <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>@VM.
To^i kho^ng hie^?u gi` ca?.
(I do not understand anything in Vietnamese).
Hoa Nguyen.
-Original Message-
From: Jeroen Cromsigt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21, 2001 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Jeroen Cromsigt/D268525/IS/DLVG is niet op zijn/haar kantoor.
Ik ben niet op kantoor vanaf 22-06-2001 tot 09-07-2001.
Ik zal uw bericht doornemen wanneer ik terug ben. Voor ADSM, TSM, Euro,
ESS, LTO, HSM of andere storage zaken, benader mijn collega's Luuk
Kleibrink tst 020-594 2043 of Sierk Andela 020-594 2472.
Hi all,
The size of my customer's Oracle data file is 1TG,but there is only 1G
real data in the DB. How can I use TDP for Oracle to bacuk/restore the min
data through Oracle RMAN?
Thank you very much !
Wang Lei
49 matches
Mail list logo
