_name=$root.$WWN.$LUN.0
>let "j=0"
>while [[ -e /dev/$new_name ]]
>do
>let "j=j+1"
>new_name=$root.$WWN.$LUN.$j
>done
>/usr/sbin/chdev -l $d -a new_name=$new_name
At 02:31 PM 7/8/2016, Rhodes, Richard L. wrote:
>Hi Everyone,
>
>I&#x
Hi Everyone,
I'm wondering how others handle lining up tape paths of multiple TSM servers in
a library sharing environment.
We have a TSM library sharing environment across our TSM instances for sharing
our two 3584 libraries. One 3584 at each datacenter with a dedicate TSm
instance fo
; >> Wanda Prather
> >> TSM Consultant
> >> ICF International Cybersecurity Division
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behal
ltant
> > >> ICF International Cybersecurity Division
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Original Message-
> > >> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On
> Behalf
w
> >> devclasses and storage pools to use going forward.
> >>
> >>
> >> Wanda Prather
> >> TSM Consultant
> >> ICF International Cybersecurity Division
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of Skylar
Thompson
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:15 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Drive preference in a mixed-media library sharing
environment
Interesting. I hadn't cons
da Prather
> TSM Consultant
> ICF International Cybersecurity Division
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
> Skylar Thompson
> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 10:15 AM
> To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
&
mber 11, 2014 10:15 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: [ADSM-L] Drive preference in a mixed-media library sharing
environment
Interesting. I hadn't considered using different libraries to solve this.
It was a little unclear from the thread - does this require partitioning on the
library
Interesting. I hadn't considered using different libraries to solve this.
It was a little unclear from the thread - does this require partitioning
on the library side? I wasn't aware that two different libraries
(presumably with two different paths) could share a single device special
node.
On Wed
It won't work. I tried and failed in a StorageTek SL500 library with
LTO4 and LTO5. Just like you are reporting, the LTO4 tapes would get
mounted in the LTO5 drives first, and then there was no free drive in
which to mount a LTO5 tape. I tried all kinds of tricks to make it work,
but it did not wor
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 03:28:59PM +1100, Grant Street wrote:
> On 10/12/14 02:40, Skylar Thompson wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > We have two TSM 6.3.4.300 servers connected to a STK SL3000 with 8x LTO5
> > drives, and 8x LTO6 drives. One of the TSM servers is the library manager,
> > and the other i
On 10/12/14 02:40, Skylar Thompson wrote:
Hi folks,
We have two TSM 6.3.4.300 servers connected to a STK SL3000 with 8x LTO5
drives, and 8x LTO6 drives. One of the TSM servers is the library manager,
and the other is a client. I'm seeing odd behavior when the client requests
mounts from the serv
Hi folks,
We have two TSM 6.3.4.300 servers connected to a STK SL3000 with 8x LTO5
drives, and 8x LTO6 drives. One of the TSM servers is the library manager,
and the other is a client. I'm seeing odd behavior when the client requests
mounts from the server. My understanding is that a mount request
.
michael.mal...@mm-it.at
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] Im Auftrag von
Grant Street
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 20. Juni 2012 10:31
An: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Betreff: Disabling the library sharing actlog messages
Hello
I was wondering if anyone had an
On 06/20/2012 08:38 AM, Neil Schofield wrote:
I personally wouldn't choose to do this, because for troubleshooting
purposes I rely on my actlog to be an authoritative source of everything
the server has done. I mainly use it to prevent messages I don't care
about (such as ANR0944E) from going t
Grant
I've not tried it, but I imagine you can disable specific events from
appearing in either the console or the activity log using, for example
DISABLE EVENTS ACTLOG ANR0408
DISABLE EVENTS ACTLOG ANR0409
I personally wouldn't choose to do this, because for troubleshooting
purposes I rely on my
Please remove me from the email distribution list.
Thanks
The information contained in this message is intended only for the personal and
confidential use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient or an agent responsible for delivering it to th
--Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU] On Behalf Of
Grant Street
Sent: Wednesday, June 20, 2012 4:31 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Disabling the library sharing actlog messages
Hello
I was wondering if anyone had an idea on how to disable th
Hello
I was wondering if anyone had an idea on how to disable the "library
sharing" messages from the actlog?
here's some stats
I have dsmserv redirect stdout and stderr to a log file.
This log file is currently 158811 lines for less than 8 hours.
If I remove the ANR0409I and AN
Remco and Stefan,
Thank you for your interesting replies.
Best wishes,
Keithy
Keith, yes, the TSM library client needs a FC connection to the drives yes
that you want it to use.
- imagine a library manager managing 80+ drives for 10+ other servers, and
> all data moving via this one LM, not a scalable solution
>
- Occam's razor applies
For as far as I know the data doesn'
On 25 jul. 2011, at 19:31, Keith Arbogast wrote:
> In SCSI library sharing, does the Library Client need fiber connections to
> the automated tape library? I understand paths to the drives are defined on
> the Library Manager and the Library Client, but does file movement to and
&g
In SCSI library sharing, does the Library Client need fiber connections to the
automated tape library? I understand paths to the drives are defined on the
Library Manager and the Library Client, but does file movement to and from tape
drives pass over fiber between the Library Client and the
nager or Microsoft Removable Storage Manager) permitting
multiple open
handles from a host to a drive to exist at the same time.
install_exclusive.exe has nothing to do with TSM library sharing.
Thanks
Henrik
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailt
quot;
27.07.2009 09:31
An: "TSM"
Kopie:
Thema: RE: [ADSM-L] two tsm server instances on the same windows
server with library-sharing
Hi,
Yes it is possible. Use the TSM concole wizard to create a second instance
and follow the steps below. Modify them to fit your sett
hello,
is it possible, to run two tsm server instances on the same windows system
using the same library?
Are there any special hints for configure the tsm server and the library
sharing?
tsm server version 5.5.3.0
with best regards
andreas
Any major things I should look out for?
Library server will be tsm 5.4.4 under Suse sles9 guest under vm 5.3
Clients tsm 5.4.4 and 5.4.2 same os and same vm lpar.
I hope to start testing tomorrow, but wanted to check in here first. I only
have our production 3494 to play with; so being extra c
Hi,
I have 2 ITSM server (5.4) running on one Windows box. One library
client, one library manager. They share (among other STA's) a LTO
library, which is working fine.
Now, I'm trying to get a filetype library working in the same manner as
the LTO library. What I did was:
- defined the file ty
retty good depending on your FCIP link size, the amount of
data etc
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Hans Christian Riksheim
Sent: Thursday, January 03, 2008 6:37 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Library sharing ove
Hi!
Does anybody have any experience with library sharing over FCIP. I am
involved in a setup where the copypool is located far awyay from the
primary backup. I am not happy with using Virtual Volumes so I want to
explore the possibility of mounting the tape drives directly over the
SAN
slots look and operate like normal I/O slots to TSM, and
REMOVE=BULK works for CHECKOUT and MOVE DRM on all of the LCs and the LM.
At this point, I'm not sure if the issue is that library sharing can't
handle UNTILEEFULL, or if the virtual I/O slots are a problem.
I was hoping to hear
AIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
09/24/2007 11:02 AM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
[ADSM-L] How do tapes get assigned to proper owneship in TSMLibrary
Sharing?
Greetings,
We hav
Greetings,
We have a configuration with 7 TSM servers all sharing the same
library using TSM Library sharing, where one instance is the Master, and
the others all view the library as owned by the Master, and appeal to it
for tape mounts, etc. This configuration has worked fine, but there
On Jun 11, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Daad Ali wrote:
...
5- What is the largest supported DB size for TSM 5.4?
Admin Guide says:
"The maximum size of the recovery log is 13GB, and the maximum size
of the database is 530GB."
Hello experts,
I have a 3494 library attached to a TSM server 5.2.2 (AIX 5.3). I am in the
process of setting up a new TSM server running TSM 5.4 and attach it to the
same library. I will need to copy the old 200GB database to the new server and
eventually unplug the old server.
I am goi
To
ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: 3584 library sharing followup
The problem is that after "cloning" the existing database to the 2nd
instance, they BOTH have the same volume information. When you
do the AUDIT LIBR on the library client, the library manager updates the
ownership of al
ROTECTED] On Behalf Of TSM_User
Sent: Saturday, September 16, 2006 1:13 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: Re: 3584 library sharing followup
On one of the instance you will delete the library and then create a new
"shared" library. When you run the audit library command
on a library client i
command on all the library clients
after they were pointed to the new library manager.
Seems like this same approch would work for you.
Kathleen M Hallahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Last week, Bill Boyer posted a message (which I no longer have) about
splitting a database and
Last week, Bill Boyer posted a message (which I no longer have) about
splitting a database and library sharing. and ownership of tapes. I saw
one response suggesting exporting and importing the data, but nothing
else.
Did anyone ever come up with other ideas on this? I'm actually getting
Hi William,
You can try EXPORT commands. With them, you can selectively export objects
from one instance to other.
On 9/6/06, William Boyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have a client using library sharing of a 3584 with LTO3 drives. Right
now their one main instance is so large it needs
I have a client using library sharing of a 3584 with LTO3 drives. Right now
their one main instance is so large it needs to be
split. The client does daily incremental as well as monthly backups. The daily
backups are domain STANDARD using stgpools 3584POOL
and 3584CPPOOL. The monthly backups
Just setup the Storage Agents as you normally would. The only exception is
that you create the paths on the TSM Library Manager. Then the TSM Library
Client will pass the mount requests to the Library Manager without any
special configuration.
Gerald Michalak
Certified TSM V5.3 Admin.
"ADSM: Di
I am trying to share a 3494 tape library between two TSM servers. The
TSM Library Manager server has storage agents defined to it but I would
like to define storage agents on the TSM Library Client server. With no
drives defined on the TSM Library Client server is it possible to define
storage ag
st in case. : )
Jim Neal
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Richard Mochnaczewski
Sent: Friday, March 17, 2006 8:09 AM
To: ADSM-L@VM.MARIST.EDU
Subject: [ADSM-L] Library sharing
Hi Everybody,
I'll be upgrading from TSM 5.1.6
et will mess up all my tape definitions. If
this is the case, do I have to pay any special attention to the library sharing
between two instances I have on this server ?
Rich
You need to define the paths for the library client on the library manager:
LIBMGR = Library Manager
LIBCLT = Library Client (as defined on DEF SERVER)
LIBMGR>def path LIBCLT DRIVEX srctype=server desttype=drive
library=LIBRARYNAME
device=/dev/your_device_as_see_by_libclient_operating_system
Th
Hi,
Aren't U missing the device parameter in define drive command ?
>>-DEFine
DRive--library_name--drive_name---
.-ONLine--=--Yes-.
>--DEVIce--=--+-device_name-+--++---
'-FILE'
'-ONLine--=--+-Yes-+-'
'-No--'
Ok I am attempting to install a second TSM server with a shared 3584
library and I need some help. Heres the config.
Server A aix 5.1 tsm server 5.3.1.6 fiber connection to library
Server B same as above.
I have set up server to server communications and was able to set up the
library on the sec
Hi ,
Im Running 3 TSM Server with one Library, The Library is Shared between
all of the TSM Servers,
2 TSM Servers are AIX and i dont have any Problem with the Library , its
runs 2 Yearswith no problem, The Problem Start when i add the Third TSM
Server its SLES 9 connected with FC to the Library,
Jin Bae Chi wrote:
If SCSI is directly attached to only one server and the other cannot see
at all, I don't see how you will make it shared. Both servers must see
any shared drive at OS level. If FC drive on LTO libr is too expensive,
you can take a look at IBM 2108 SAN Data gateway router.
Gus
T
gt;> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/25/05 8:53 AM >>>
Hello!
I'm trying to set up library sharing among two servers
(named LM and LC) as described in
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Linux: Administrator's Guide
(http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/ITSML/GC23-4690-01/en_US/HTML/anrlgd5147.
Hello!
I'm trying to set up library sharing among two servers
(named LM and LC) as described in
IBM Tivoli Storage Manager for Linux: Administrator's Guide
(http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/tividd/td/ITSML/GC23-4690-01/en_US/HTML/anrlgd5147.htm).
Device I try to share: LTO 3581 Ultri
As it relates to Tivoli Storage Manager SAN Tape Library Sharing.
Can anyone tell me if a TSM Server 5.3.0.0 as a library manager is
compatible with a TSM Server 5.2.2.0 as a library client? They are
sharing a 3494.
I would like to avoid upgrading both of my TSM servers at the same time if
Hi,
I'm working in a library sharing env.:
* library manager: TSM 5.1.9.3 on Solaris8
* 5 library clients: TSM 5.1.9.3 on Solaris8
* tape library: IBM 3584 (12 LTO drives)
For testing purposes I added a new TSM library client. It is also a
TSM 5.1.9.3 but it's running on a Li
t; Define path libclient drive srct=serv destt=drive libr=libname
> devi=whateverdevicenameis
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Gilles
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2004 9:48 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
Hi,
In a library sharing env. with the library manager [5.1.9.3] running
on Solaris8 and the library clients [5.1.9.3] running on various OS
(Solaris8 & Linux) how do I have to define the PATH to the library
[IBM3584] ? only once ?
With n Solaris8 library clients the path to the library is
Karel
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Cain, Jason (Corporate)
Sent: dinsdag 27 juli 2004 17:09
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 3494 library sharing serious problem - HELP!
Has anyone done this successfully at code level 5.2.0.1. I have
Has anyone done this successfully at code level 5.2.0.1. I have 2 TSM servers both at
the same code level, I am trying to do library sharing using the TSM1 server as the
library manager and TSM2 server as the client. The paths are defined to TSM1(the
manager) and everything works except a DB
; On Behalf Of Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
> Sent: 6 mai 2004 13:04
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Server-to-server communications through a firewall
> for Library Sharing
>
>
> The subject pretty much covers it.
>
> I need to communicate between TSM servers, one behind a fi
The subject pretty much covers it.
I need to communicate between TSM servers, one behind a firewall (tape
Library Client), the other not (tape Library Manager which communicates
with the 3494 which has the SAN FC attached drives)...
It would be nice if the two servers always kept the connection o
ray/AC/VCU
> Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Library sharing
>
>
> Thanks for all the help in this area. I think I finally got it working !
>
> Now then, how do I get this (WWN) or similar information from a Windows
> TSM serve
Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 17:08
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Library sharing
Serial numbers or the WWN of the device? Several responses showed you how to
get the serial number, but the WWN can be gotten with 'lsattr -El rmtx'
command.
Bill
Serial numbers on Win2003
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Bill Boyer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Verzonden: donderdag 1 april 2004 17:08
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Library sharing
Serial numbers or the WWN of the device? Several responses showed you how to
get the serial number
ray/AC/VCU
Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2004 8:58 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Library sharing
Thanks for all the help in this area. I think I finally got it working !
Now then, how do I get this (WWN) or similar information from a Windows
TSM server, since it too will be sharing the 3494ATL a
copies of the original
message.
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
04/01/04 07:58 AM
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:
I can see the serial numbers on the 2K3 server. How can I get the
serial-numbers from AIX ?
Zoltan,
Try lscfg -vl.
$ lscfg -vl rmt0
DEVICELOCATION DESCRIPTION
rmt0 10-58-00-4,0 IBM 3590 Tape Drive and Medium
Changer
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Library sharing
Then substitute storage agent client for library client. You define the
paths on the library manager server. The PATHS reference the library
client
servername, the library name (which I believe must be the same name) and
the
drive n
8 PM
Please respond to
"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc
Subject
Re: Library sharing
Then substitute storage agent client for library client. You define the
paths on the library manager server. The PATHS reference the library
client
servern
mud, right?
-Original Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Zoltan Forray/AC/VCU
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Library sharing
Well, in this case, it isn't, sortof...
I don't have *ANY* path stat
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Library sharing
Well, in this case, it isn't, sortof...
I don't have *ANY* path statements on the client, that refer to these
drives. All that is defined on the client is the SHARED LIBRARY. This
gt;
> define path SA1 LTO1 srctype=server desttype=drive library=3584
> device=/dev/rmt3
>
> Bill Boyer
> DSS, Inc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Karel Bos
> Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:54 AM
Message-
From: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Karel Bos
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Library sharing
Hi,
Can be, but don't have to be the same... In the past I saw some machines
with different device names fo
2004 17:46
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: Re: Library sharing
Hi,
>From my experience with 3584 Library, the rmt devices should be
The same on both machines e.g. server_1 /dev/rmt1 /dev/rmt2 etc...
And also on the library client /dev/rmt1 ...
AH
-Original Message-
From: Zoltan F
5:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Library sharing
Trying to get ATL library sharing working between two TSM AIX servers.
I think I finally got the definitions correct..at least they seem to
function.
However, I can't get the library client (capella) to use the drives. Every
Trying to get ATL library sharing working between two TSM AIX servers.
I think I finally got the definitions correct..at least they seem to
function.
However, I can't get the library client (capella) to use the drives. Every
time it does, I get these errors in the activity log
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Kopie:
Thema: Re: Antwort: cross platform
library sharing aix w2k
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received : 21.01.2004
Thnx Markus,
You gave me the right answer in the right time ...boy I love this list...
Best Regards,
Koen.
From: Markus Veit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Antwort: cross platform library sharing
ema: cross platform library
sharing aix w2k
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received : 21.01.2004
13:09
Bitte antworten an "ADSM:
Dist Stor Manager"
Dear Listers,
Does anybody knows if it is possible to share a library betwee
Dear Listers,
Does anybody knows if it is possible to share a library between AIX and w2k.
Using the sharing functionality in TSM.
THNX,
Koen
_
Talk with your online friends with MSN Messenger http://messenger.msn.nl/
...
>ANR0252E Error writing logical page 250880 (physical page 251136) to
>database volume /tsm/volumes/o00tsmtoe2-
>/stg01/dbvol00b.TSMTOFF00.
>ANRD Error writing to database logical volume.
>ANR7838S Server operation terminated.
>ANR7837S Internal error BUF087 detected.
Paul - The probably r
Hello everybody,
I try to configure a tsm-server running with a non-root user-id.
It's TSM 5.1 with a 3494 library shared from another TSM 5.1 library manager
Starting dsmserv as non-root the server crashes with a core when
trying to make a database backup.
With starting dsmserv as root this works
tor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
14.11.2003 20:03
Please respond to "ADSM: Dist Stor Manager"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Library sharing from a 5.1 AIX 4.3.3.11 TSM server to a
5.2 server on
AIX 5.1ML4-ANRD smlshare.c
Rejean,
T
To
Manager" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
.EDU>
Subject
Re: Libr
Hello,
since you specify that you do library sharing between a TSM 5.1 server and
a TSM 5.2 server then this is a problem. As the TSM 5.2 server readme says
:
* Library Sharing and LAN-Free Upgrade Considerations
nager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by:"ADSM: Dist Stor Manager" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: Library sharing from a 5.1 AIX 4.3.3.11 TSM server to a 5.2
server on AIX 5.1ML4-ANRD smlshare.c
Thanks Justin- there is a small d
To
Sent by: "ADSM: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dist Stor cc
Manager"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject
.EDU> Re: Lib
TECTED]>
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Library sharing from a 5.1 AIX 4.3.3.11 TSM server to a 5.2
server on AIX 5.1ML4-ANRD smlshare.c
Hello out there-- anyone got any ideas on this one? I've googled (and
searched the APAR db) the smlshare.c and the unknown verbTy
arted for server TSM_HQ3
02:19:07PM (AIX-RS/6000) (Tcp/Ip) for library sharing.
11/13/2003 ANRD smlshare.c(2174): ThreadId<81>
Server-to-Server
02:19:07PM protocol error. unknown verbType=20992.
11/13/2003 (81) Context report
02:19:07PM
We have used two methods in the past and are looking at a third alternative
for the future. In the past, I partitioned the 3494 and divided the six
SCSI drives we had between between two systems, four and two. At present
we have a single 3494, with five frames, two fibre connected drives, and 6
S
Hi all,
We have to expand our TSM-infrastructure. Today we have 2 * H80 (AIX 5.1), 2
* 3494 (each with 8 * 3590 E1A connected via SCSI to H80)
I would prefer to get 2 more AIX-Servers (6C4) with SAN-adapters and 2 *
library with 3592 (or LTO) adapted to the SAN.
But that is the most expensive way.
ED]cc:
ES> Subject: Re: TAPE LIBRARY SHARING
Sent by: "ADSM:
PROTECTED]
-Mensaje original-
De: Mark Ferraretto [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enviado el: miércoles, 18 de junio de 2003 3:21
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: TAPE LIBRARY SHARING
Hi,
There are two ways. You can set up a shared tape library. I haven't done
this but I know yo
STo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
Hi TSMers:
We have 1 AIX TSM Server 4.2.3.3 with 2 IBM LTO 3584.
I want to install a new TSM server on AIX (version 5.1.6.5) and
share the two libraries. Is it possible? How?
Any ideas? Can anyone send me the detailed procedure?
Este mensaje de correo electrónico y s
As you have already learned the hard way, library sharing would not work
if you have not defined paths to *all* drives for sharing.
Quote from TSM for AIX, Managed System for SAN Storage Agent User's Guide
(GC32-0771-00; just the same wording I quoted for v4.2 in June last year):
"Defin
[RC]
- Original Message -
From: "Anthonijsz, Marcel M SITI-ITDGE13" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 19, 2003 3:05 AM
Subject: 3584 Library sharing problems.
To all,
I've a bit of a challenge.
We're running TSM 5.1.6.3 on two AI
MAIL PROTECTED]
>>X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9
>>Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2003 15:21:47 -0600
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>From: Jim Sporer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Subject: Tape Library Sharing
>>Cc: JAMES J SPORER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
&g
Tape Library Sharing 2nd Time
>Since I didn't get an answer the first time I sent this I assume nobody
>has ever done it. Does anybody have an opinion on whether it can be done
>this way or must I copy all of the data?
>Jim Sporer
>
>
>>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
&
: Tape Library Sharing 2nd Time
>Since I didn't get an answer the first time I sent this I assume nobody
>has ever done it. Does anybody have an opinion on whether it can be done
>this way or must I copy all of the data?
>Jim Sporer
>
>
>>X-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
8 Mar 2003 15:21:47 -0600
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jim Sporer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Tape Library Sharing
Cc: JAMES J SPORER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have a 3494 ATL that is shared between two TSM servers. Right now the
Library is partitioned, meaning I have a separate set of pr
1 - 100 of 161 matches
Mail list logo
