work for a laptop, for desktop systems it might be
sufficient to use an add-in NIC rather than the built-in one -- but the
limited info I've found suggests that the IME may be able to snoop on
all devices and so defeat this tactic. Does anyone here know?
Thanks for any information,
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
security and correctness.
--
Dave Anderson
will pass through an
interface. And I haven’t found any way of filtering on untagged connections
(something like ‘! tagged any’ would be nice). I’m sure that my setup isn’t
unique, so there must be a good way of dealing with this, but I’ve no idea what
it might be. Suggestions, please!
--
Dave
> On Jun 1, 2021, at 16:50, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>
> On 2021-05-30, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> I’m setting up on 6.9-release a (for now) IPv4-only firewall with multiple
>> public addresses and multiple subnets behind it, and have a couple of
>> quest
Safari isn’t providing much useful information, but starting today I’m
consistently getting a “server stopped responding” error when trying to access
the online man pages at man.openbsd.org. www.openbsd.org is working fine.
Dave Anderson
d...@daveanderson.com
Oops! I did see that message but forgot that it mentioned man.openbsd.org.
Apologies for the noise. (But that Safari error message sucks!)
Dave Anderson
d...@daveanderson.com
> On Dec 21, 2023, at 21:55, Daniel Jakots wrote:
>
> On Thu, 21 Dec 2023 21:22:49 -0500, Dave Anders
“Server stopped responding” implies that it did provide some response before
stopping. “Server did not respond” would be more accurate and less confusing.
Dave Anderson
d...@daveanderson.com
> On Dec 23, 2023, at 07:27, hahahahacker2...@airmail.cc wrote:
>
> On 2023-12-22 10:39, Dave
se 2 pieces of information plus your name and town
together that makes it secure. Just guessing. Did I overlook anything?
--
Dave Anderson
oot, editing the duids in /etc/fstab, and
fixing up /etc/hostname.*, but I'm hoping that there's a better way.
Thanks in advance for any suggestions (or confirmations that there is no
better way).
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
at adapting their
>ordering system to the people ordering from all over the world, but
>we'll get there step by step I hope.
I hit a couple of those bumps on my first order from them, and they were
_very_ good about analyzing and fixing them.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
--
Dave Anderson
conf && config GENERIC.MP && cd
../compile/GENERIC.MP
make clean && make
make install
reboot
cd /usr/obj && touch junk && mkdir -p .old && mv * .old && rm -rf .old &
cd /usr/src && make obj && cd /usr/src/etc && env DESTDIR=/ make distrib-dirs
cd /usr/src && make build
Thanks for any help,
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
atest version without any release
>tags, since you mention following -current)
Thanks for the suggestion; I'll give it a try -- and double-check that
the cvs update worked properly.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
On Tue, 4 Dec 2012, Dave Anderson wrote:
Problem solved; PEBCAK. I didn't fully understand what 'cvs update' was
doing, and managed to create a source tree containing a mixture of old
and current files.
Apologies for the noise.
Dave
>I recently upgraded to the 2 D
update.
As usual, you're doing the right thing -- and we appreciate it.
I hate to think of the likely mess if this sort of error had happened
with some commercial software package.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
ve overheard quite a bit of discussion on the subject.) I'd strongly
recommend that, before doing anything about this, you carefully
investigate what your responsibilities and liabilities would be.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
nightmares yet running it
internally with limited outside connectivity and reliable (static) web
front end site is an option for control of this critical aspect.
At that point you're as good as a personal self sustained service.
--
Dave Anderson
Canadian X.25
service) PAD -> remote PAD -> remote dial-out service -> another modem ->
another multiplexer -> serial line into, IIRC, ttyA on a Sun system I was
helping someone repurpose. The entire install completed successfully off a
network boot in about an hour at 2400bps (*and* simultaneously 2400baud,
all you pedants out there...).
Wow.
--
Dave Anderson
at uhub2 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 "SuYin
HP TrueVision HD" rev 2.00/1.10 addr 4
video0 at uvideo0
uhub3 at uhub1 port 1 "Intel Rate Matching Hub" rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2
vscsi0 at root
scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on sd0a (c3ffcff67dc13a92.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Dave Anderson
00/0.00 addr 2
ugen0 at uhub2 port 1 "Validity Sensors product 0x0018" rev 1.10/0.78 addr 3
uvideo0 at uhub2 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 "SuYin
HP TrueVision HD" rev 2.00/1.10 addr 4
video0 at uvideo0
uhub3 at uhub1 port 1 "Intel Rate Matching Hub" rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2
vscsi0 at root
scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on sd0a (c3ffcff67dc13a92.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Dave Anderson
On Mon, 25 Aug 2014, Adam Thompson wrote:
>On 14-08-25 03:49 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> My amd64 notebook (full dmesg below) has started reporting an error
>> which I don't adequately understand. Any explanations or ideas as to
>> how to figure out exactly what
Just got mine, near Boston, Mass.
My thanks to everyone involved.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, JJ Jumpercables wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:56 PM, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> Just got mine, near Boston, Mass.
>>
>
>Jut curious... how long ago did you order?
As soon as I saw the announcement that orders were open -- I don't
remember exactly
t!
Wait for May 1st.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
gt; it's a pisser.
What might make sense is to alter the script to generate a list of
canditates for whitelisting, but only apply any of them after they are
manually approved.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
0/0.01 addr 3
Remove iPhone4S:
ugen1 detached
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
ere I know of (other than by looking in the
source).
>-Bryan.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Brynet wrote:
>On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:30:44PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> For the iPhone, yes, but evidently not for the iPad2.
>
>Yes, it will be a manual effort for as long as Apple releases new devices.
>
>> >If you want to use libusb por
eventually found a model where everything I cared about worked.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
s a good reason for leaving this
alone. I haven't looked into the pkg_add source myself because it's
large, complicated and (especially) under active development.
--
Dave Anderson
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012, Ingo Schwarze wrote:
>Hi Dave,
>
>Dave Anderson wrote on Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 12:14:57PM -0500:
>
>> and then ran 'pkg_add -ui' it was unable to update those files:
>> "Couldn't find updates for uvideo-firmware-1.2p0, iwn-firmware-
by this. Any clues would be greatly appreciated.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
On Fri, 27 Jan 2012, Philip Guenther wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:10 PM, Dave Anderson
>wrote:
>> I've run into this problem perhaps a dozen times over the past several
>> months while running amd64-current, most recently at 15:53 2012/1/26 EST
>> while runni
#x27;)
>ioconf.c:224: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>ioconf.c:224: warning: (near initialization for 'cfdata[3]')
>ioconf.c:226: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>ioconf.c:226: warning: (near initialization for 'cfdata[4]')
>ioconf.c:228: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>ioconf.c:228: warning: (near initialization for 'cfdata[5]')
>ioconf.c:230: warning: excess elements in struct initializer
>ioconf.c:230: warning: (near initialization for 'cfdata[6]')
>
>The last ones continue for many more lines for 68 members of the array
>before the make process exits.
>
>Now this has happened twice, on brand new systems, also I've found other
>list posts describing the same errors but no solutions applying to my
>situation. So what do I do to get 5.0 compiled?
>
>--
>Hdlsningar / Greetings
>
>Stefan Midjich
>[De omnibus dubitandum]
>
--
Dave Anderson
On Sat, 24 Dec 2011, Dave Anderson wrote:
>On Fri, 23 Dec 2011, Brynet wrote:
>
>>On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 09:30:44PM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>>> For the iPhone, yes, but evidently not for the iPad2.
>>
>>Yes, it will be a manual effort for as long as Apple rel
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012, Nick Holland wrote:
>On 01/28/12 09:12, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> Thanks for the info. I've been using -Pd because
>> <http://www.openbsd.org/anoncvs.html> says to use them; I haven't yet
>> had a chance to look into how cvs works bey
entry for tht dir wil be different than the other's.
>
>The exact cause of the slowdown is not known to me. But when you are
>switch repositories once in a while it's easy to get this case.
>
>I repair this by find . -name Root | xargs rm and using a explicit cvs
>root.
>
> -Otto
Hmmm. That doesn't seem to [fully] explain the slowdowns I've seen,
since I always use an explicit cvs root (following the FAQ) though I
certainly have switched repositories from time to time.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
y checking for /dev/whatever in the /altroot fstab entry -- but
I've been using DUIDs (as set up by the installer).
Shouldn't the daily script be updated to handle DUIDs as well as
explicit devices in /etc/fstab?
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:42:07AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> I've got a system running amd64/mp -current (latest source update on
>> February 1st) and have noticed (for quite a while, actually) that the
>> night
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012, Dave Anderson wrote:
>On Tue, 7 Feb 2012, Kenneth R Westerback wrote:
>
>>On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 09:42:07AM -0500, Dave Anderson wrote:
>>> I've got a system running amd64/mp -current (latest source update on
>>> February 1st) and have n
1 "vendor 0x138a product 0x0018" rev 1.10/0.78 addr 3
uvideo0 at uhub2 port 2 configuration 1 interface 0 "SuYin
HP TrueVision HD" rev 2.00/1.10 addr 4
video0 at uvideo0
uhub3 at uhub1 port 1 "Intel Rate Matching Hub" rev 2.00/0.00 addr 2
vscsi0 at root
scsibus1 at vscsi0: 256 targets
softraid0 at root
scsibus2 at softraid0: 256 targets
root on sd0a (c3ffcff67dc13a92.a) swap on sd0b dump on sd0b
--
Dave Anderson
On Mon, 27 Feb 2012, Dave Anderson wrote:
>I recently upgraded an HP dv7-6b63us notebook (dmesg below) to amd64/mp
>5.1-current as of about 11:30 EST 25 February 2012 (rebuilt from source
>several times since installing a 7 February snapshot) and have started
>seeing
>
> ah
of the original
message) he has identified what may be the only place in the install
process where a single wrong keystroke can do major damage. Everyplace
else I can think of there's at least an opportunity to abort the
installation after making a mistake but before the damage is done.
I've no great love for 'are you sure' questions, but they may be
appropriate where they prevent a single easy-to-make mistake from
causing serious damage.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
ss to information which is not generally available. And if
any of the answers is 'no', the security of anything run under that
virtualization may be fatally compromised -- no matter how secure that
software may be when run standalone.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
l they had already become established
practice (and so, almost impossible to undo).
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tion of
"recommend", I expect that most of this discussion would end.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gt;> > IP address via dhclient
>> >
>> > I have a naive question: Is there any way to avoid that? I mean: is
>> > there a way to surpass the mac filter and get an ip?
>>
>> Do I understand this correctly? You are asking how to *defeat* someone
>> else's
>> SOHO NAT router, using its MAC filter as their only security?
>>
>> If so, I'm appalled by your lack of ethics.
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(e.g., EEPROM) or permanent (e.g., ROM) -- it's just easier to provide a
malicious firmware file for loading than it is to convince someone to
replace a ROM chip. Even for a pure-hardware device, with no firmware
at all, you still have to trust the manufacturer to avoid bugs which can
harm the system as a whole.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
orsement.
I don't recall seeing any of them claiming that. Many of them _have_
(quite reasonably) objected to your spreading misinformation about
OpenBSD. And making statements which are true only if common words are
given non-standard meanings certainly amounts to spreading
misinformation.
programs that could be installed, implicitly
>that recommends installing FOO as an option for people to consider.
>
>Perhaps "implicitly recommend" would be a clearer description of this
>particular case.
It would be closer to reality, but would still massively overstate the
case.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
tems. But that's quite different from demanding
an endorsement.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e is, at best,
weasel-wording.
>One reason I do not want to call this a "barrier" is that it suggests
>other things. Many people thought I objected to the general capability
>of the ports system to install any program. That misunderstanding
>seems to come words like "barrier".
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
r really
>is suspicious or disallowed.
Read the RFCs rather than guessing. 'Mail From: <>' is not merely
allowed but is _required_ when a delivery-failure message is sent.
You're throwing away most legitimate notifications of errors delivering
messages which originated on your serv
g' caused by forged 'from'
header addresses in spam. While it's not possible to do this in _all_
cases, bad addresses can be handled at the SMTP 'rcpt to' command with
(usually) very little effort and greylisting (and associated tools) can
reject a large fraction of spam messages at this stage.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2008/02/08 11:35, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> On Fri, 8 Feb 2008, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>>
>> >Raimo Niskanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> >
>> >> If a backscatter gets through to sendmail, and
ich set the tag "VPN1" and will get
>"APP_VPN1" ?? This is not a good behavior, IMHO.
Why not just require that any application-generated tag must start with
some fixed string ("APP_" or "@" or whatever)?
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Henning Brauer wrote:
>* Dave Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-03-07 17:34]:
>> On Fri, 7 Mar 2008, Konrad wrote:
>>
>> >>> Nice, you probably want to keep the application/kernel tag name spaces
>> >>> distinct though. Ot
I've been working on the pf configuration for my home firewall, and
have reviewed a lot of documentation in the process. I've noticed
that, when discussing queueing, the pf FAQ mentions only CBQ and PRIQ
while man pf.conf(5) also defines HFSC.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
more options to tweak the generated rules and to avoid the delay
involved in modifying the program whenever someone comes up with a new
need.
Thanks in advance for any info,
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Peter N. M. Hansteen wrote:
>"Dave Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> that, when discussing queueing, the pf FAQ mentions only CBQ and PRIQ
>> while man pf.conf(5) also defines HFSC.
>
>It's probably a matter of coming up
a 'solution' which might change when I upgrade (or even just
reboot) is not acceptable.
Thanks in advance for either direct answers or pointers to relevant bits
of documentation that I've missed.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Mon, 17 Mar 2008, Stuart Henderson wrote:
>On 2008-03-17, Dave Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I've been working on the pf configuration for my home firewall,
>> including setting up ftp-proxy. I've noticed that the command is
>> getting cluttere
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008, Camiel Dobbelaar wrote:
>Dave Anderson wrote:
>> I've been working on the pf configuration for my home firewall,
>> including setting up ftp-proxy. I've noticed that the command is
>> getting cluttered with options to adjust the rules it creat
ty of IPv6 traffic,
you could easily configure PF to block all IPv6.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
l of your interfaces). The question is, can you convince the
powers-that-be that doing this is sufficient? It clearly should be,
since it prevents any possibility of communicating via IPv6.
Good luck,
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>account?
This depends on your 'local' mail-delivery program definition in
sendmail.cf. IIRC the standard program will only deliver to real
users. I'm using maildrop (from packages) to allow delivery to virtual
users (who access their mail via POP); there are undoubtedly other such
programs available.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
case) is the same as if the {} construct were evaluated as an OR
within a single rule, but that's not how it's implemented.
Dave
PS: I'm definitely *not* a pf/pfctl expert, but I believe that I do
understand how this bit of it works. If I'm wrong, I'm sure that I'll
be corrected quickly.
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
of not releasing adequate documentation -- so accepting blobs
(even when "there's no other choice") actively harms the anti-blob
campaign.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;s purposes? It seems to me
that in those cases the cost to implement and maintain is so low as to
be worthwhile even if it only avoids relatively unlikely problems.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
about being required to run monitoring
software, just about being required to run Windows rather than his
accustomed OS (presumably because Windows is the only OS that the
government's preferred monitoring software will run on).
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Gilles Chehade wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 11:19:40AM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Lars Hansson wrote:
>>
>> >On 8/28/07, Die Gestalt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Why doesn't he run the monitoring
On Tue, 28 Aug 2007, Emilio Perea wrote:
>On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 12:49:56PM -0400, Dave Anderson wrote:
>> But, as I understand the issue, this is _not_ part of his specified
>> punishment -- it's just a side-effect of the manner in which the
>> government wants
ows
boxes can't handle more than 2 resolver addresses? If so, and if
they're getting their DNS-server information via DHCP, it might be much
easier and almost as effective to hack the DHCP server to have a large
pool of DNS-server addresses and randomly(?) select two of them to
provide in each response it sends.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
d lose
>> rights under the law beyond those which the law specifies as being taken
>> away. Is this a correct inference?
>
>I don't think think running Linux is a basic human right.
This looks remarkably like a "yes" answer to my question.
We've gotten pretty fa
IIRC this is true for any country which has adopted the Berne
Convention, which is currently almost every country which has any
copyright law in place. It includes the U.S.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
clearly and authoritatively stated to exclude
that interpretation -- so anyone who is aware of this yet still changes
the license text in this case is, at the very least, behaving
unethically.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
e greylisting time...
Or take advantage of the (by default) 25 minute window to use other
means to detect that this address is sending spam. Perhaps spamd should
be extended to look for excessive attempts to send messages from an
address during that period? (How often do spammers' lists contain only
one or two addresses from a domain?)
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
will sure be appreciated.
Maybe I'm missing something, but (given that everything else is working
and assuming that the systems on LAN B have a default route directed to
GW B) wouldn't a static route on GW B for 207.12.0.0/18 pointing to
10.74.10.245 do the job?
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
hreaded (both because that's much easier
than multi-threaded and because multi-cpy systems were rare back then)
and has not [yet] been changed because changing to a multi-threaded
kernel requires a lot of very finicky work (with innumerable
opportunities to introduce very subtle bugs).
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
words, it's not possible to do what you want. (It can
*appear* to work, but you'll have obscure problems where some requests
quietly fail for no obvious reason.)
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
n.example IN A192.168.13.57
So if you want this to work when your internet connection is down you
need to either set up your own DNS server (it's not all that hard, but
is certainly not trivial) or find a mailer (if one exists) that does
some special hackery to avoid DNS queries for locally-addressed
messages.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
whatever malware is involved is using the
software installed on the hijacked computer. More likely, it is
opening a connection to your web server itself and sending whatever
request and supplementary information it wants (which is the same in
all cases, since it's the same malware).
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
er...as apparently you do, as well.
Have you considered having a vestigal section (something like '6.8:
[removed]') to make it obvious that there's no error with very little
extra work on your part?
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
.org.IN ANY
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.oorexx.org. 86400 IN A 208.34.240.200
;; Query time: 289 msec
;; SERVER: 202.131.95.2#53(ns1.planetdomain.com)
;; WHEN: Thu Oct 2 13:42:44 2008
;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 48
Where did that CNAME come from, why does it have what looks like an IPv4
address as its value (rather than an FQDN, as is IIRC required), and why
doesn't it show up when we request all information?
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Today's mail delivered the 4.4 CDs near Boston, Mass.
Many thanks to the developers,
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ame.only if there's only one NIC found, the sysadmin
could assign interfaces to groups and use those group names everywhere,
and so not need to use the actual interface names at all.
This appears to be a fairly simple change. Does it sound reasonable to
people with more knowledge of OpenBSD networking?
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Ted Unangst wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Dave Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Network configuration has bugged me a bit ever since I started using
>> OpenBSD, not just the real security issue that Harald Dunkel points out
&
be worth doing
something about. Or if it suggests a change which is worthwhile in
itself and also solves the problem.
>> This appears to be a fairly simple change. Does it sound reasonable to
>> people with more knowledge of OpenBSD networking?
>
>No, it is not reasonble. You are inventing problems at a very high
>level just because some very low level pci-related bug is making some
>of your devices not reliably show themselves.
No, I'm thinking about a general way for those people who care about it
to tie pf rules, etc, to specific physical interfaces, regardless of
what other devices are installed or configured in a system.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, Chris Kuethe wrote:
>On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 3:55 PM, Dave Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm just confused, but my recollection is that one needs to set up
>> the appropriate hostname. to enable the interface before
>> th
On Fri, 7 Nov 2008, johan beisser wrote:
>On Nov 7, 2008, at 9:44 AM, Dave Anderson wrote:
>>
>> Perhaps most of these issues could be dealt with by changing the
>> network
>> configuration procedure to have a hierarchy of interface-configuration
>> files rather
root entropy source /dev/arandom
>
>So why is /var/named/dev/arandom "not configured". Is there something
>that needs to be done beside MAKEDEV?
Is /var marked 'nodev' in /etc/fstab?
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The 4.3 CD set arrived today near Boston, Mass.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
homework and are
trying to get other people to do it for you.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mething goes wrong.
Again, developers will usually ignore bug reports dealing with custom
kernels, unless the problem can be reproduced in a GENERIC kernel as
well. You have been warned.
Dave
>29.04.08, 19:13, "Dave Anderson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>> OpenBSD com
rk administrator will
>need to round up to 24 (or 16)."
>
>23 or 8 what? Bits? What are 23 and 8 alternatives of? 24 or 16 looks
>like alternative prefix lengths for class A or B networks, but I don't
>get 23 or 8.
Somewhere along the line the exponentiation operator (^) has
969
>[howl] error sending packet to 224.0.0.251 (23126)
>[assert] error: 64 (Host is down)
>[assert] where: "socket.c", "sw_socket_udp_really_sendto", line: 969
>...
>
>Thanks.
>
>-- Jeremy
>
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ter
version of the Java runtime. The only exceptions I'm aware of involve
one of the rare and well publicized API changes in the class libraries
or Microsoft's pseudo-Java, which was deliberately incompatible (in
violation of the Java licence) as a marketing move.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A Card /S , AXE2201, PNP80D6, " port
0x240/32 irq 5
ne3: NE2000 Ethernet
ne3: address 00:40:05:c0:ad:75
biomask e945 netmask ef65 ttymask ffe7
pctr: 586-class performance counters and user-level cycle counter
enabled
dkcsum: wd0 matched BIOS disk 80
root on wd0a
rootdev=0x0 rrootdev=0x300 rawdev=0x302
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
** Reply to message from "Todd C. Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
on Sat, 09 Jul 2005 18:55:03 -0600
>In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> so spake "Dave Anderson" (dave):
>
>> If I'm reading it correctly, this bit of the dmesg says that my hard
that first 504M,
>the system will boot without problem or delay, as it won't try to detect
>the disk parameters at all, and OpenBSD will properly detect the entire
>disk.
Thanks for the detailed info, and especially for this hint -- which I
will certainly try.
Dave
--
Dave Anderson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
