Good Afternoon,


The latest revision, 05, of the fee draft was just posted.



I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting to discuss the most 
current revision of the Fee draft, draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-05. This latest 
draft should account for all comments to this point.



The meeting will be held Tuesday July 11th, 2017 at 13:00 UTC. We will utilize 
Zoom as the conferencing tool, please use this 
link<https://godaddy.zoom.us/j/944283307> to connect to the meeting.





Thanks

Roger





-----Original Message-----
From: James Galvin [mailto:gal...@elistx.com]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 8:19 AM
To: Jody Kolker <jkol...@godaddy.com>
Cc: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com>; Registration Protocols Extensions 
<regext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal



Yes, please, let’s move forward with scheduling a meeting to discuss the fee 
document on 11 July.



Please take the lead.



Jim







On 21 Jun 2017, at 11:18, Jody Kolker wrote:



> Thanks Jim/Antion/Adam,

>

> I fully support having virtual meetings between full IETF meetings.  I

> think it would help to move documents along faster.  Roger and I were

> discussing having a meeting for the fee document on July 11th.  Will

> we be able to have an approved meeting on that day?

>

>

> Thanks,

> Jody Kolker

>

>

> -----Original Message-----

> FromR: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James

> Galvin

> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 12:55 PM

> To: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com<mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>>

> Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions 
> <regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>>

> Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal

>

>

>

> On 16 Jun 2017, at 12:40, Roger D Carney wrote:

>

>> Good Afternoon,

>>

>>

>>

>> I think this is a great idea and I think this process looks

>> acceptable. I have just one question and one comment.

>

> Thanks!

>

>

>> Question: To clarify number 3 below "...chairs will handle

>> administrative tasks...summary...", I assume the summary will be

>> provided by the requester to the chairs for correct handling?

>

> Yes, that would be our preference.  In fact, to go a step farther in

> detail, if the interim meetings are “one document” meetings, then the

> author/editor will prepare for the meeting with a bulleted list of

> “issues” to discuss.  The summary is most likely just the same

> bulleted list with a few sentences or paragraphs (as needed) to state

> the consensus of the meeting regarding the issue.  This summary could

> be posted to the list as is, as well as being used as the Secretariat

> summary.

>

>

>>

>>

>>

>> Comment: As for "...as a replacement for the second WG meetings at

>> IETF meetings...", I would like to see these interim meetings as an

>> addition to and not a replacement. I think the F2F working sessions

>> that we had at IETF-98 were very productive and we should try to keep

>> doing.

>

> Thanks for this.  We won’t have this option in Prague unfortunately

> (the Chairs had timing conflicts this time) but I’m interested in

> other points of view for the future.

>

> Jim

>

>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Thanks

>>

>> Roger

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> -----Original Message-----

>> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James

>> Galvin

>> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 8:41 AM

>> To: Registration Protocols Extensions 
>> <regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>>

>> Subject: [regext] interim meetings proposal

>>

>>

>>

>> In addition to updating our milestones, a few folks have asked us

>> privately for interim meetings to help move along our documents.  The

>> Chairs have followed up with our Area Director and in this message we

>> have a proposal for interim meetings for the working group to

>> consider.

>>

>>

>>

>> For reference the IETF has some guidance on interim meetings located

>>

>> here:

>>

>>

>>

>> http://ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings.html

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Here is what we propose.  Please review and comment on the list by

>> Friday, 23 June 2017.

>>

>>

>>

>> 1. Any author/editor from a document on our milestone list can

>> request an interim meeting.  As long as there is no objection from

>> the working group the meeting can proceed.  In general, the

>> author/editor would be expected to moderate the meeting but anyone

>> can volunteer.

>>

>>

>>

>> 2. The meeting can be a teleconference, which someone will need to

>> provide.  You can also have a physical meeting if there is interest

>> and the logistics can be organized by the participants.

>>

>>

>>

>> 3. The Chairs will handle the administrative tasks with the IETF

>> Secretariat.  The basics are that the meeting must be reported to the

>> IETF Secretariat, the agenda must be provided, and at the conclusion

>> of the meeting a summary must be provided that includes the list of

>> participants.

>>

>>

>>

>> 4. There are two critical details that must be respected: the meeting

>> must be announced with its agenda provided at least one week before

>> it actually begins, preferably two weeks, and the meeting summary

>> must be provided within 10 days of the close of the meeting.

>>

>>

>>

>> 5. Finally, please note that any actions taken or decisions made at

>> the interim meeting are not final.  They must be reviewed and

>> accepted on the mailing list.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> If we can come to a consensus that this is acceptable, with any

>> changes that we agree to during the discussion here, we will adopt

>> this and tell the folks who wanted to have a meeting to suggest it

>> and arrange to have it.

>>

>>

>>

>> If we have interim meetings, these could serve as a replacement for

>> the second working group meeting that we had at the last IETF

>> meeting.

>>

>>

>>

>>

>>

>> Thanks,

>>

>>

>>

>> Antoin and Jim

>>

>>

>>

>> _______________________________________________

>>

>> regext mailing list

>>

>> regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org%3cmailto:regext@ietf.org>>

>>

>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

>

>

>> _______________________________________________

>> regext mailing list

>> regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>

>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

>

> _______________________________________________

> regext mailing list

> regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>

> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________
regext mailing list
regext@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext

Reply via email to