Hello Jody, On 21/06/2017 17:18, Jody Kolker wrote:
> Thanks Jim/Antion/Adam, > > I fully support having virtual meetings between full IETF meetings. I think > it would help to move documents along faster. Roger and I were discussing > having a meeting for the fee document on July 11th. Will we be able to have > an approved meeting on that day? The meeting aside, may we still expect a new version of the fee extension draft (with the fixes suggested by James Gould and myself on this list) before July 11th? To be frank, I'm not quite happy with the sluggish pace at which the fee extension has been maintained recently, i.e. in my point of view, some of the - in part rather trivial - changes have taken quite some time to be incorporated, and sometimes new issues were introduced in the process. That being said, please note that I'm quite aware that all of this is voluntary, unpaid work, and I truly appreciate the efforts of all people involved. Then again, many of our registrars are waiting for a new, stable version of the fee extension, which therefore at this point must be regarded as a crucial part of many registries' EPP interface. It should therefore be maintained with sufficient dedication. Best regards, Thomas -- TANGO REGISTRY SERVICES® is a product of: Knipp Medien und Kommunikation GmbH Technologiepark Phone: +49 231 9703-222 Martin-Schmeisser-Weg 9 Fax: +49 231 9703-200 D-44227 Dortmund E-Mail: supp...@tango-rs.com Germany _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
