I'll attend.
Scott From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Antoin Verschuren Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2017 4:28 AM To: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com> Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal Hi Roger, Since we had no objections, I'm about to issue this interim meeting request. 2 small administration questions: -How long will the meeting last (estimate, I have put 1 hour for now). -Could you or expected attendees provide a bulleted list of issues you would like to address or talk about? ("Discuss the most current revision of the Fee draft" for now, but that might be hard to summarize :-)) And for the WG: To give the chairs and organizer a sense of participation, since this will be our first interim meeting, who on this mailinglist is thinking of joining this session? Regards, - -- Antoin Verschuren Tweevoren 6, 5672 SB Nuenen, NL M: +31 6 37682392 Op 24 jun. 2017, om 18:05 heeft Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com<mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>> het volgende geschreven: Good Afternoon, The latest revision, 05, of the fee draft was just posted. I would like to invite everyone to an interim meeting to discuss the most current revision of the Fee draft, draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-05. This latest draft should account for all comments to this point. The meeting will be held Tuesday July 11th, 2017 at 13:00 UTC. We will utilize Zoom as the conferencing tool, please use this link<https://godaddy.zoom.us/j/944283307> to connect to the meeting. Thanks Roger -----Original Message----- From: James Galvin [mailto:gal...@elistx.com] Sent: Friday, June 23, 2017 8:19 AM To: Jody Kolker <jkol...@godaddy.com<mailto:jkol...@godaddy.com>> Cc: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com<mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>>; Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>> Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal Yes, please, let's move forward with scheduling a meeting to discuss the fee document on 11 July. Please take the lead. Jim On 21 Jun 2017, at 11:18, Jody Kolker wrote: > Thanks Jim/Antion/Adam, > > I fully support having virtual meetings between full IETF meetings. I > think it would help to move documents along faster. Roger and I were > discussing having a meeting for the fee document on July 11th. Will > we be able to have an approved meeting on that day? > > > Thanks, > Jody Kolker > > > -----Original Message----- > FromR: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James > Galvin > Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 12:55 PM > To: Roger D Carney <rcar...@godaddy.com<mailto:rcar...@godaddy.com>> > Cc: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>> > Subject: Re: [regext] interim meetings proposal > > > > On 16 Jun 2017, at 12:40, Roger D Carney wrote: > >> Good Afternoon, >> >> >> >> I think this is a great idea and I think this process looks >> acceptable. I have just one question and one comment. > > Thanks! > > >> Question: To clarify number 3 below "...chairs will handle >> administrative tasks...summary...", I assume the summary will be >> provided by the requester to the chairs for correct handling? > > Yes, that would be our preference. In fact, to go a step farther in > detail, if the interim meetings are "one document" meetings, then the > author/editor will prepare for the meeting with a bulleted list of > "issues" to discuss. The summary is most likely just the same > bulleted list with a few sentences or paragraphs (as needed) to state > the consensus of the meeting regarding the issue. This summary could > be posted to the list as is, as well as being used as the Secretariat > summary. > > >> >> >> >> Comment: As for "...as a replacement for the second WG meetings at >> IETF meetings...", I would like to see these interim meetings as an >> addition to and not a replacement. I think the F2F working sessions >> that we had at IETF-98 were very productive and we should try to keep >> doing. > > Thanks for this. We won't have this option in Prague unfortunately > (the Chairs had timing conflicts this time) but I'm interested in > other points of view for the future. > > Jim > > >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Roger >> >> >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: regext [mailto:regext-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of James >> Galvin >> Sent: Friday, June 16, 2017 8:41 AM >> To: Registration Protocols Extensions <regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org>> >> Subject: [regext] interim meetings proposal >> >> >> >> In addition to updating our milestones, a few folks have asked us >> privately for interim meetings to help move along our documents. The >> Chairs have followed up with our Area Director and in this message we >> have a proposal for interim meetings for the working group to >> consider. >> >> >> >> For reference the IETF has some guidance on interim meetings located >> >> here: >> >> >> >> http://ietf.org/iesg/statement/interim-meetings.html >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Here is what we propose. Please review and comment on the list by >> Friday, 23 June 2017. >> >> >> >> 1. Any author/editor from a document on our milestone list can >> request an interim meeting. As long as there is no objection from >> the working group the meeting can proceed. In general, the >> author/editor would be expected to moderate the meeting but anyone >> can volunteer. >> >> >> >> 2. The meeting can be a teleconference, which someone will need to >> provide. You can also have a physical meeting if there is interest >> and the logistics can be organized by the participants. >> >> >> >> 3. The Chairs will handle the administrative tasks with the IETF >> Secretariat. The basics are that the meeting must be reported to the >> IETF Secretariat, the agenda must be provided, and at the conclusion >> of the meeting a summary must be provided that includes the list of >> participants. >> >> >> >> 4. There are two critical details that must be respected: the meeting >> must be announced with its agenda provided at least one week before >> it actually begins, preferably two weeks, and the meeting summary >> must be provided within 10 days of the close of the meeting. >> >> >> >> 5. Finally, please note that any actions taken or decisions made at >> the interim meeting are not final. They must be reviewed and >> accepted on the mailing list. >> >> >> >> >> >> If we can come to a consensus that this is acceptable, with any >> changes that we agree to during the discussion here, we will adopt >> this and tell the folks who wanted to have a meeting to suggest it >> and arrange to have it. >> >> >> >> If we have interim meetings, these could serve as a replacement for >> the second working group meeting that we had at the last IETF >> meeting. >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Antoin and Jim >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> regext mailing list >> >> regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org%3cmailto:regext@ietf.org>> >> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > >> _______________________________________________ >> regext mailing list >> regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext > > _______________________________________________ > regext mailing list > regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext _______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org<mailto:regext@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
_______________________________________________ regext mailing list regext@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/regext
