Client/server is hardly new technology!

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 10:35 AM, geoff <data...@adam.com.au> wrote:
> Im with you. I don't get why I would want to put my data on someone else's
> server and subject to the speed and availability of my internet access. Like
> so many new technologies I think it is totally oversold. It has its place -
> but not for many if not most businesses - once they get over the hype.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: profox-boun...@leafe.com [mailto:profox-boun...@leafe.com] On Behalf
> Of Allen
> Sent: Friday, 16 September 2011 5:59 PM
> To: profox@leafe.com
> Subject: RE: [NF] Windows 1 vs. Windows 8
>
> Am I missing something with cloud computing? I see it as a way for google,
> microsoft and the like to get your data and for governments to watch what
> you're up to. This is just putting all your confidential documents on a
> server, someone else's server?
> Al
>
> -----Original Message-----
>
> The real action for Microsoft might come from its improved Window Server
> 8 OS, which should give commercial versions of Linux and Unix OS(s) like
> Redhat, SUSE, and Macs running osX more competition.  Window Server 8
> also targets VMware and other proprietary offerings from
> hardware/software giants like IBM and HP.  It will also compete with
> third parties that offer cloud computing; because, it offers the cloud
> within an enterprise.
>
>
>
[excessive quoting removed by server]

_______________________________________________
Post Messages to: ProFox@leafe.com
Subscription Maintenance: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profox
OT-free version of this list: http://leafe.com/mailman/listinfo/profoxtech
Searchable Archive: http://leafe.com/archives/search/profox
This message: 
http://leafe.com/archives/byMID/profox/cadwx0+jmpqy45vgfmardgtuw5du8png4vxdgqntwjguumcm...@mail.gmail.com
** All postings, unless explicitly stated otherwise, are the opinions of the 
author, and do not constitute legal or medical advice. This statement is added 
to the messages for those lawyers who are too stupid to see the obvious.

Reply via email to