On Thu, Mar 05, 2015 at 02:55:49PM -0000, WPB wrote: > I wondered if that might be the case. Fair enough, then. Perhaps the > duplicate messages option is cleanest without a large development > overhead. Bit of a headache for internationalizing, but I think the > FatMessages file uses a dot-separated hierarchical structure for key > names, doesn't it? So you could have en.ro.AppHelp and > en.ro.AppHelp.NoFunc, for example, to keep it clean, perhaps?
Sure, after the first two dots it's just a string up to : that is used to key it, IIRC. But again, please not "NoFunc". B.
