On Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:48:35 -0800 Seth Mattinen <se...@rollernet.us> wrote:
> William Pitcock wrote: > > On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote: > >>> ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole > >>> Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being > >>> involved, nor the provider that belongs to. > >> Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's > >> hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank > >> up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch > >> the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there. > > > > Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding > > what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to > > think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to > > ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo". > > > > You should still be able to submit a ticket to SORBS, no? I was always > under the impression that it was "open a ticket and wait or you are > moved to the back of the line" with SORBS. > More like "pay our ransom or FOAD". Why I never use them.... -- John
