On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 23:39 +0000, John Levine wrote: > >ASPEWS is listing 216.83.32.0/20 as being associated with the whole > >Atrivo incident of 2008. My memory does not recall 216.83.32.0/20 being > >involved, nor the provider that belongs to. > > Since nobody but the occasional highly vocal GWL uses ASPEWS, it's > hard to see why one would care, but if you want to find ASPEWS, crank > up your favorite usenet program, post a question to nanae, and watch > the vitriol roll in. There might be a comment from ASPEWS in there.
Well, I just want to reach SORBS to clear up some confusion regarding what ranges of mine are dynamic (e.g. none of them, but they seem to think otherwise). Unfortunately, e-mail to SORBS bounces due to ethr.net being listed in ASPEWS as being "part of Atrivo". I think it is kind of fail that RBL people do not have e-mail based contact addresses. Snoozenet is unpleasant to deal with. William
