[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> 
> Then I sugest you to use: 
> 
> macro pager \cv "<enter-command>set 
>pgp_verify_sig\n<exit><display-message><enter-command>unset pgp_verify_sig\n" "Check 
>PGP sig"

One question: Why isn't there a general solution for this FAQ (sic!)? In
the last five months I read mutt-users this problem came up several
times.  Lots of mutt-users post their (more or less) complicated macros
which always have their disadvantages. Ok, it seems not to me mutt's
philosophy to support this traditional style. But there are some flags
to handle it (some of them from patches). But none of these patches
handles the old style in the same easy way than the new one. It's nice
to validate old-style-PGP on keypress. And you can build several macros
to do this in a more-or-less-working manner. But isn't there a solution
like "set handle_trditional_pgp_like_new_style=yes"?

Please don't write: There is no patch for this, write one. I don't have
any clue about this. Unfortunately. I just see the lots of people asking
for this feature (and I guess there are many more wanting it but didn't
ask).  And all of them have the same problems.  I really don't want to
start a flame war or so. I just wonder about this fact. Is it so hard to
implement this feature that old style works straightforward (i.e. not
with many macros covering approx. 75%)?

    -volker

-- 
  http://die-Moells.de/  *  http://Stama90.de/  *  http://ScriptDale.de/

"reality.sys corrupted - reboot universe? y/n"

Reply via email to