Jeremy Blosser wrote: > > procmail or other MDAs will always be able to do it better, because they're > looking at the message in exactly the right way at exactly the right time. > With Mutt you're always going to have this effect not stick with the > message (so you have to do it every time), you have to apply it when you > enter the folder instead of as the message comes in, and the effect is not > available in another MUA if you need to use one, even briefly. This is by > definition an MDA issue. And the MDAs do it fine, so why not?
I'm honesty, I don't have much knowledge about procmail. But in my eyes it's *not* the job of the MDA. The mail's syntax is correct, so there is no need to modify/correct them. If tomorrow a very-new-style will become standard you wouldn't transform your whole Mailbox into this one, world you? I see no error in argumenting that it's the *MUA*'s job. I see your point, that vith procmail it's way faster. But this doesn't bother me (if the checking is done on demand). P.S.: Sorry again for the wrong subject line. I proofread the body, but I forgot to do it on the subject. :-\ -volker -- http://die-Moells.de/ * http://Stama90.de/ * http://ScriptDale.de/ Press any key to continue or any other key to quit...