* David T-G ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [Jan 24. 2002 10:00]: > ...and then Brian Clark said...
> % I was trying to get something similar to work yesterday. No one > % finds it odd that one can't check a single signature? I've given > % up, and just set pgp_verify_sig to ask-no, but I have to hit Enter > % twice when entering a message. I'd rather set it to 'no' and set > % pgp_verify_sig with hooks for _specific_ people, then use some > % command to check individual signatures for anyone else. :-\ > I think it's becoming a more common request, but in the past it's been > pretty typical to either verify all or care about none. We just have > to evolve :-) OK, maybe I'm not getting something about GnuPG and/or Mutt's interaction with GnuPG, then (Nope, not being sarcastic here). If I set this thing to verify all signatures, and I have my keyserver settings in place, every single key that I verify is being added to my keyring. Is this not undesirable by most people? -- Brian Clark | Avoiding the general public since 1805! Fingerprint: 07CE FA37 8DF6 A109 8119 076B B5A2 E5FB E4D0 C7C8 It may be your sole purpose in life to serve as a warning to others.
