On 2001-05-11 16:02:11 -0400, adam morley wrote: >that is not required by rfc 2646, it is a should statment. and it >is there for non-flow aware mail readers. we avoid this when not >wrapping and using fixed, as it aint flowed text. You don't expect this to look nice in any usual mailer, do you? -- Thomas Roessler http://log.does-not-exist.org/
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Aaron Schrab
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Sam Roberts
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Thomas Roessler
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... rex
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... Suresh Ramasubramanian
- Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message ... adam morley