Re: Changing the Mime type of the outgoing message by default?

[adam morley]

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:04:50PM -0400, Sam Roberts wrote:
> Quoting adam morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, who wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 04:34:03AM -0500, Aaron Schrab wrote:
> > > At 23:04 -0400 10 May 2001, adam morley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 12:43:28AM +0530, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:
> > > > see in one second, then it can be classified as a flowed message.  a
> > > 
> > > I suppose it *could* be classified as such, but I don't see much point
> > > in doing so.  The whole point of format=flowed is so that paragraphs
> > > will wrap in programs that support it, but still be readable with
> > > programs that don't do wrapping.
> > 
> > well, the whole point is that ppl dont like unwrapped text.  so one solution has 
>been format=flowed.
> > 
> > any others?
> 
> Don't send unwrapped text?

why?  (and if you open up this can of worms, i can go on for at least 20 messages, so 
if others dont want to hear it, we might want to take it off the list)

> 
> Sam
> 
> -- 
> Sam Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

-- 
thanks
adam

any and all ideas herein are the sole property of the author, with no implied 
warranties or guarantees.  unless its somebody else's already.