On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 10:42:43PM +0200, Thomas Roessler wrote:
> On 2001-05-11 15:59:30 -0400, adam morley wrote:
> 
> >ah, no line *should* be longer than 78 chras, correct?  its a 
> >should, not a must if i remember.
> 
> Which means that you shouldn't violate this unless you have a very 
> good reason (such as a long word) to violate it.

my point is the reason for not violating said should clause is archaic.  my reason is 
that if your mail reader can't handle it, step into the 21st century and get a reader 
that knows how to wrap text.

> 
> -- 
> Thomas Roessler                          http://log.does-not-exist.org/

-- 
thanks
adam

any and all ideas herein are the sole property of the author, with no implied 
warranties or guarantees.  unless its somebody else's already.

Reply via email to