In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build the eoip and then put your good IPs on top of the eoip?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson <ajohn...@thewisp.net> wrote: > Ours was/is a /29. > > > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <ajohn...@thewisp.net> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * <http://www.thewisp.net/> > <http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < > mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > >> Between the two routers it's a /30 >> >> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch. About >> 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted). >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >> Suite 1337 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >> Troy, OH 45373 >> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users < >> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >> >>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks >>> around these links? >>> >>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote: >>> > Hey Josh, >>> > >>> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation. >>> What >>> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an AF24<>AF24 >>> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where the >>> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these scenarios. >>> > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each >>> has >>> > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary >>> and >>> > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency and >>> > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the >>> same >>> > result. >>> > >>> > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but was >>> > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that it >>> > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it in >>> > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this for >>> > about 8 months now. >>> > >>> > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround >>> that >>> > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and imho >>> is >>> > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel. >>> > >>> > Cheers! >>> > >>> > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >>> > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=460+TAMPICO,IL+61283&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * >>> > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> >>> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users >>> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote: >>> > >>> > CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the RB750. >>> > >>> > On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched. >>> > >>> > >>> > Josh Luthman >>> > Office: 937-552-2340 >>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 >>> > 1100 Wayne St >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> > Suite 1337 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> > Troy, OH 45373 >>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>> > >>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <lamb...@lambertfam.org >>> > <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote: >>> > >>> > On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote: >>> > >>> > There are two Ubnt backhauls between them. >>> > >>> > >>> > With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run >>> > broadcast. I always run Point-to-point over wireless links >>> with >>> > exactly two endpoints. A lot of that is leftover from when >>> most >>> > 802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast. >>> > >>> > What connects the two backhauls? Crossover cable? Switch, >>> > smart or dumb, brand? >>> > >>> > Which interface are you using on the 1009? Is it a combo >>> port? >>> > Is it in the switch group? >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix >>> > SysAdmin >>> > lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org> >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > _______________________________________________ >>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik-users mailing list >> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >> >
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
