No, but I'm pretty sure it's a good version since it works for every other
router.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 3:33 PM Robert via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org wrote:

> Is the 3.65 gear latest firmware?
>
> On 10/30/18 12:16 PM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users wrote:
> > Hmm everything but a 3.65 Ubnt panel.  I could easily plug a CCR into a
> 750.
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340
> > Direct: 937-552-2343
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018, 3:15 PM RickG <rgunder...@gmail.com
> > <mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >     Josh, Can you put this equipment on a test bench?
> >
> >     On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:53 PM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
> >     <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >
> >         Multicast Data is allowed and Multicast Enhancement is Enabled
> >         on the AP.  The STA Multicast Data is allowed by there is no
> >         option for Multicast Enhancement.  Should I disable the
> >         enhancement on the AP only?  I assume I have to enable Multicast
> >         on these links.  (FYI one is 5 GHz the other is 3.65 GHz -
> >         802.11n "M" gear).
> >
> >         There is an RB750 switch (software bridge).  L2 MTU 1598.
> >
> >
> >         Josh Luthman
> >         Office: 937-552-2340
> >         Direct: 937-552-2343
> >         1100 Wayne St
> >         Suite 1337
> >         Troy, OH 45373
> >
> >         On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users
> >         <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
> wrote:
> >
> >             I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it
> >             works for a while then stops, then comes back. Disabling the
> >             instance as you do to fix it makes the whole adjacency start
> >             over which starts with new LSAs.
> >             Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to
> >             establish the adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just
> >             allows for the election of the DR/BDR and more than two
> >             endpoints compared to Point-to-point network type. Anyway,
> >             it’s not the issue.
> >             Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently
> >             disabled) Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is
> >             there a switch between the two UBNT links in the middle?
> >
> >             Sent from my iPhone
> >
> >             On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via
> >             Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >             <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >
> >>             In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build
> >>             the eoip and then put your good IPs on top of the eoip?
> >>
> >>
> >>             Josh Luthman
> >>             Office: 937-552-2340
> >>             Direct: 937-552-2343
> >>             1100 Wayne St
> >>             Suite 1337
> >>             Troy, OH 45373
> >>
> >>             On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson
> >>             <ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>> wrote:
> >>
> >>                 Ours was/is a /29.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                 *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
> >>                 (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net
> >>                 <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>
> >>                 PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
> >>                 *WWW.THEWISP.NET | *
> >>                 <http://www.thewisp.net/><
> http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>
> >>                 <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>                 On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via
> >>                 Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                 <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>                     Between the two routers it's a /30
> >>
> >>                     Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its
> >>                     own over lunch.  About 11 hours of it not working
> >>                     (see the log previously posted).
> >>
> >>
> >>                     Josh Luthman
> >>                     Office: 937-552-2340
> >>                     Direct: 937-552-2343
> >>                     1100 Wayne St
> >>                     <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>                     Suite 1337
> >>                     <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>                     Troy, OH 45373
> >>                     <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>
> >>                     On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews
> >>                     via Mikrotik-users <mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                     <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
> >>
> >>                         So this brings up a question that we ran into,
> >>                         what are the netmasks
> >>                         around these links?
> >>
> >>                         On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via
> >>                         Mikrotik-users wrote:
> >>                         > Hey Josh,
> >>                         >
> >>                         > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a
> very similar situation. What
> >>                         > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011
> connected to an AF24<>AF24
> >>                         > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not
> complete adjacency, where the
> >>                         > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup
> is PtP in these scenarios.
> >>                         > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on
> our network, and each has
> >>                         > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix
> was adding a secondary and
> >>                         > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and
> it created adjacency and
> >>                         > ran without error. We did the same for the
> second instance with the same
> >>                         > result.
> >>                         >
> >>                         > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a
> week or so later, but was
> >>                         > unable to find the cause or solution in the
> time we had. Given that it
> >>                         > was working without error, albeit slightly
> messy, we have left it in
> >>                         > place with more important things to tackle.
> It has been like this for
> >>                         > about 8 months now.
> >>                         >
> >>                         > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix,
> but it is a workaround that
> >>                         > may provide further information to lead to
> the issues cause, and imho is
> >>                         > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel.
> >>                         >
> >>                         > Cheers!
> >>                         >
> >>                         > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
> >>                         > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net
> >>                         <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>
> >>                         <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net
> >>                         <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>>
> >>                         > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
> >>                         <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=460+TAMPICO,IL+61283&entry=gmail&source=g>
> >>                         > *WWW.THEWISP.NET <http://WWW.THEWISP.NET> | *
> >>                         >
> >>                         <http://www.thewisp.net/><
> http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>
> >>
> >>                         > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman
> via Mikrotik-users
> >>                         > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                         <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >>                         <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                         <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>> wrote:
> >>                         >
> >>                         >     CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links
> before hitting the RB750.
> >>                         >
> >>                         >     On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo
> port, not switched.
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >     Josh Luthman
> >>                         >     Office: 937-552-2340
> >>                         >     Direct: 937-552-2343
> >>                         >     1100 Wayne St
> >>                         <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>                         >     Suite 1337
> >>                         <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>                         >     Troy, OH 45373
> >>                         <
> https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g
> >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >     On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <
> lamb...@lambertfam.org
> >>                         <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>
> >>                         >     <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org
> >>                         <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>>> wrote:
> >>                         >
> >>                         >         On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman
> wrote:
> >>                         >
> >>                         >             There are two Ubnt backhauls
> between them.
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >         With recent firmware it shouldn't be
> a big deal to run
> >>                         >         broadcast.  I always run
> Point-to-point over wireless links with
> >>                         >         exactly two endpoints.  A lot of that
> is leftover from when most
> >>                         >         802.11 based wireless links had
> issues with broadcast.
> >>                         >
> >>                         >         What connects the two backhauls?
> Crossover cable?  Switch,
> >>                         >         smart or dumb, brand?
> >>                         >
> >>                         >         Which interface are you using on the
> 1009?  Is it a combo port?
> >>                         >         Is it in the switch group?
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >         --
> >>                         >         Scott Lambert
> KC5MLE                     Unix
> >>                         >         SysAdmin
> >>                         > lamb...@lambertfam.org
> >>                         <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>
> >>                         <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org
> >>                         <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>>
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                          _______________________________________________
> >>                         >     Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >>                         > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                         <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >>                         <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                         <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>>
> >>                         >
> >>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> >>                         >
> _______________________________________________
> >>                         > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >>                         > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                         <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >>                         >
> >>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >>                         >
> >>                         _______________________________________________
> >>                         Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >>                         Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                         <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >>
> >>
> >>                     _______________________________________________
> >>                     Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >>                     Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> >>                     <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >>
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >>
> >>
> >>             _______________________________________________
> >>             Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >>             Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >>             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >             _______________________________________________
> >             Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >             Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >             http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >         _______________________________________________
> >         Mikrotik-users mailing list
> >         Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
> >         http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> >
> >
> >     --
> >     -RickG
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to