So...uhh...this is kind of embarrassing. I may have fixed it (OSPF just his adjacency of 19h, previous max uptime was 12 hours). Someone mentioned the Ubnt backhaul versions or something so I double checked and it never got updated. One of the two backhauls was running 5.5 or something ancient. I upgraded it and everything seems to be OK now, at least we're hitting a new record after 4 days of <12 hour uptimes.
I don't work much with multicast but I was always under the impression that APWDS and STAWDS simply acted as a transparent bridge. Clearly it doesn't. Sorry for the noise and thanks for the sanity checks/making me look at the firmware versions on the backhauls! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 4:15 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users < mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > I would make sure spanning tree is off on the 750 sw bridge and go ahead > and turn off Multicast Enhancement on the APs (leave Multicast Allowed as > enabled). > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Oct 30, 2018, at 12:52 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > wrote: > > Multicast Data is allowed and Multicast Enhancement is Enabled on the AP. > The STA Multicast Data is allowed by there is no option for Multicast > Enhancement. Should I disable the enhancement on the AP only? I assume I > have to enable Multicast on these links. (FYI one is 5 GHz the other is > 3.65 GHz - 802.11n "M" gear). > > There is an RB750 switch (software bridge). L2 MTU 1598. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 2:31 PM, Jesse Dupont via Mikrotik-users < > mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: > >> I think it’s an LSA flooding issue, especially since it works for a while >> then stops, then comes back. Disabling the instance as you do to fix it >> makes the whole adjacency start over which starts with new LSAs. >> Using a “broadcast” network type doesn’t use broadcasts to establish the >> adjacencies, it still uses multicast. It just allows for the election of >> the DR/BDR and more than two endpoints compared to Point-to-point network >> type. Anyway, it’s not the issue. >> Have you tried disabling (or enabling if it’s currently disabled) >> Multicast Enhancement on the two UBNT links? Is there a switch between the >> two UBNT links in the middle? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On Oct 30, 2018, at 11:50 AM, Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < >> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >> >> In your case did you use a "hidden non used" /30 to build the eoip and >> then put your good IPs on top of the eoip? >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:43 PM, Adam R Johnson <ajohn...@thewisp.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Ours was/is a /29. >>> >>> >>> *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >>> (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>> PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >>> *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * <http://www.thewisp.net/> >>> <http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> >>> <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users < >>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>> >>>> Between the two routers it's a /30 >>>> >>>> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch. >>>> About 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted). >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+Suite+1337+Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users < >>>> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks >>>>> around these links? >>>>> >>>>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote: >>>>> > Hey Josh, >>>>> > >>>>> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation. >>>>> What >>>>> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an AF24<>AF24 >>>>> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where >>>>> the >>>>> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these >>>>> scenarios. >>>>> > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each >>>>> has >>>>> > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary >>>>> and >>>>> > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency >>>>> and >>>>> > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the >>>>> same >>>>> > result. >>>>> > >>>>> > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but >>>>> was >>>>> > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that >>>>> it >>>>> > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it in >>>>> > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this >>>>> for >>>>> > about 8 months now. >>>>> > >>>>> > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround >>>>> that >>>>> > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and >>>>> imho is >>>>> > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel. >>>>> > >>>>> > Cheers! >>>>> > >>>>> > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* >>>>> > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net> >>>>> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=460+TAMPICO,IL+61283&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * >>>>> > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> >>>>> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users >>>>> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the >>>>> RB750. >>>>> > >>>>> > On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > Josh Luthman >>>>> > Office: 937-552-2340 >>>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>>> > 1100 Wayne St >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> > Suite 1337 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> > Troy, OH 45373 >>>>> <https://maps.google.com/?q=1100+Wayne+St+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Suite+1337+%0D%0A+%C2%A0+%C2%A0+%C2%A0Troy,+OH+45373&entry=gmail&source=g> >>>>> > >>>>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <lamb...@lambertfam.org >>>>> > <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote: >>>>> > >>>>> > There are two Ubnt backhauls between them. >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run >>>>> > broadcast. I always run Point-to-point over wireless links >>>>> with >>>>> > exactly two endpoints. A lot of that is leftover from when >>>>> most >>>>> > 802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast. >>>>> > >>>>> > What connects the two backhauls? Crossover cable? Switch, >>>>> > smart or dumb, brand? >>>>> > >>>>> > Which interface are you using on the 1009? Is it a combo >>>>> port? >>>>> > Is it in the switch group? >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > Scott Lambert KC5MLE >>>>> Unix >>>>> > SysAdmin >>>>> > lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org> >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> >>>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > _______________________________________________ >>>>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>>> > >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Mikrotik-users mailing list >>>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >>>> >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik-users mailing list >> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mikrotik-users mailing list >> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > >
_______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
