So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks around these links?
On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote: > Hey Josh, > > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation. What > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an AF24<>AF24 > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where the > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these scenarios. > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each has > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary and > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency and > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the same > result. > > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but was > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that it > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it in > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this for > about 8 months now. > > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround that > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and imho is > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel. > > Cheers! > > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT* > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283 > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | * > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet> > > > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote: > > CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the RB750. > > On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <lamb...@lambertfam.org > <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote: > > On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote: > > There are two Ubnt backhauls between them. > > > With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run > broadcast. I always run Point-to-point over wireless links with > exactly two endpoints. A lot of that is leftover from when most > 802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast. > > What connects the two backhauls? Crossover cable? Switch, > smart or dumb, brand? > > Which interface are you using on the 1009? Is it a combo port? > Is it in the switch group? > > > > > -- > Scott Lambert KC5MLE Unix > SysAdmin > lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org> > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > > > > _______________________________________________ > Mikrotik-users mailing list > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users > _______________________________________________ Mikrotik-users mailing list Mikrotik-users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
