Ours was/is a /29.

*ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
(815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <ajohn...@thewisp.net>
PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
*WWW.THEWISP.NET | * <http://www.thewisp.net/>
<http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>  <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>



On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 10:36 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users <
mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:

> Between the two routers it's a /30
>
> Interesting thing to note...it came back up on its own over lunch.  About
> 11 hours of it not working (see the log previously posted).
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 1:27 PM, Robert Andrews via Mikrotik-users <
> mikrotik-users@wispa.org> wrote:
>
>> So this brings up a question that we ran into, what are the netmasks
>> around these links?
>>
>> On 10/30/2018 10:14 AM, Adam R Johnson via Mikrotik-users wrote:
>> > Hey Josh,
>> >
>> > Just throwing in my 2 cents here. We have a very similar situation.
>> What
>> > was once a powercode bmu, is now a rb3011 connected to an AF24<>AF24
>> > then another rb3011. The 3011s will not complete adjacency, where the
>> > bmu and 3011 did originally. Our OSPF setup is PtP in these scenarios.
>> > We have this setup in 2 separate locations on our network, and each has
>> > the same problem. Our 'stab in the dark' fix was adding a secondary and
>> > temporary 192.168.x.x/24 on the segment, and it created adjacency and
>> > ran without error. We did the same for the second instance with the
>> same
>> > result.
>> >
>> > We revisited the issue, to try to resolve a week or so later, but was
>> > unable to find the cause or solution in the time we had. Given that it
>> > was working without error, albeit slightly messy, we have left it in
>> > place with more important things to tackle. It has been like this for
>> > about 8 months now.
>> >
>> > Im not necessarily advocating this as a fix, but it is a workaround
>> that
>> > may provide further information to lead to the issues cause, and imho
>> is
>> > a bit nicer than an EoIP tunnel.
>> >
>> > Cheers!
>> >
>> > *ADAM JOHNSON — PRESIDENT*
>> > (815) 304-6008 | ajohn...@thewisp.net <mailto:ajohn...@thewisp.net>
>> > PO BOX 460 TAMPICO,IL 61283
>> > *WWW.THEWISP.NET | *
>> > <http://www.thewisp.net/><http://www.facebook.com/thewispnet>
>> > <http://www.twitter.com/thewispnet>
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 8:37 AM Josh Luthman via Mikrotik-users
>> > <mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:mikrotik-users@wispa.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     CCR goes through two Ubnt wireless links before hitting the RB750.
>> >
>> >     On the CCR1009 it is ether4 - not a combo port, not switched.
>> >
>> >
>> >     Josh Luthman
>> >     Office: 937-552-2340
>> >     Direct: 937-552-2343
>> >     1100 Wayne St
>> >     Suite 1337
>> >     Troy, OH 45373
>> >
>> >     On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 11:33 AM, Scott <lamb...@lambertfam.org
>> >     <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>> wrote:
>> >
>> >         On 2018/10/30 09:24, Josh Luthman wrote:
>> >
>> >             There are two Ubnt backhauls between them.
>> >
>> >
>> >         With recent firmware it shouldn't be a big deal to run
>> >         broadcast.  I always run Point-to-point over wireless links with
>> >         exactly two endpoints.  A lot of that is leftover from when most
>> >         802.11 based wireless links had issues with broadcast.
>> >
>> >         What connects the two backhauls?  Crossover cable?  Switch,
>> >         smart or dumb, brand?
>> >
>> >         Which interface are you using on the 1009?  Is it a combo port?
>> >         Is it in the switch group?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >         --
>> >         Scott Lambert                  KC5MLE                     Unix
>> >         SysAdmin
>> >         lamb...@lambertfam.org <mailto:lamb...@lambertfam.org>
>> >
>> >
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> >     Mikrotik-users@wispa.org <mailto:Mikrotik-users@wispa.org>
>> >     http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> > Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> Mikrotik-users mailing list
>> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Mikrotik-users mailing list
> Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users
>
_______________________________________________
Mikrotik-users mailing list
Mikrotik-users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/mikrotik-users

Reply via email to