On Sun, Sep 9, 2018 at 4:41 PM Timothy Arceri <tarc...@itsqueeze.com> wrote:
>
> On 10/09/18 09:22, Ian Romanick wrote:
> > On 09/08/2018 06:37 AM, Jason Ekstrand wrote:
> >> Is there going to be an accompanying series on the piglit list?  I don't
> >> see anything there immediately.
> >
> > Which is one of the major reasons we decided we'd never implement this
> > extension in Mesa.  To test it to the quality levels that we expect, it
> > would literally take 1,000+ test cases.
>
> As I said in the other thread refusing to implement this extension is
> only going to hurt Mesa users and continue the "just use Nvidia if you
> want things to work narrative". AMD have also indicated they would be
> adding support for this extension in radeonsi. I'm willing to write
> tests if they are not up to your quality levels the feel free not to
> enable the extension in your driver.

There are so many things wrong with the last statement.

There's a legitimate debate to have here, but not like this.

> > I'll ask the question I always ask in these situations: Has anyone
> > bothered talking to the developer?
>
> The game is years old they are not going to rewrite it now just because
> it doesn't run on Mesa drivers. The game doesn't even support Linux in
> the first place.

Is it actually the game that EXT_dsa or WINE?
_______________________________________________
mesa-dev mailing list
mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev

Reply via email to