2016-09-30 16:57 GMT+02:00 Ian Romanick <i...@freedesktop.org>: > On 09/30/2016 06:23 AM, Brian Paul wrote: >> On 09/30/2016 04:59 AM, Emil Velikov wrote: >>> On 30 September 2016 at 03:31, Timothy Arceri >>> <timothy.arc...@collabora.com> wrote: >>>> On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 19:17 -0700, Jason Ekstrand wrote: >>>> >>>> On Sep 29, 2016 5:14 PM, "Timothy Arceri" <timothy.arc...@collabora.com> >>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, 2016-09-29 at 15:56 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote: >>>>>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created, and >>>>>>> soon >>>>>>> it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there any reason we haven't created the stable branch yet? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Ideally, we would time the release so that it's 1-2 months before >>>>>>> fall >>>>>>> distribution releases. >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks Marek ! >>>>>> >>>>>> In all honesty I was secretly hoping that we'll get Dave/Bas RADV for >>>>>> 12.1. >>>>> >>>>> I believe the release should be 13?? Core Mesa and the Intel driver >>>>> have reached 4.4 this release also core Mesa is now at 4.5 despite not >>>>> being enabled anywhere. >>>> >>>> My personal preference, for whatever it's worth, would be to call it >>>> 12.1. >>>> The 12.0 release was the biggest release we've had in a long time and it >>>> seems odd to me to jump to 13.0 right away when we really haven't >>>> done much >>>> at all in terms of new features. (I think it's only 2 or 3 desktop >>>> features >>>> in the case of Intel. A bit more on the ES side I guess). >>>> >>>> >>>> My understanding is the major version has only ever been bumped when >>>> full >>>> support for a new desktop OpenGL version has been reached regardless >>>> of the >>>> number of extensions enabled. We did the same thing going from 8.0 > 9.0 >>>> were as the 7 release went all the way to 7.11 over a 4 year period. It >>>> seems odd to change the way we bump versions at this point in time, >>>> although >>>> in future maybe it will need to be based on Vulkin versions also. >>>> >>> Brain freeze - seem to miss-remember that enhanced layouts (thus 4.4) >>> landed after the branch point. >>> That plus the ES3.1/ES3.2, compat for the desktop GL, (by Ilia/Ken) >>> does take us to 13.0. >>> >>> At the end of the day it's just a number albeit being the "unlucky" one. >>> >>> If we get a consensus amongst the majority of devs we can change the >>> versioning scheme. But for that let's do so in a ~weeks time - after >>> the branchpoint. >> >> I'd say to go to 13.0 if we're now supporting GL 4.4. That'd follow the >> general pattern. > > I agree. The only question is what we do after GL 4.5 bumps us to 14.0. > There is a distinct possibility (spoiler alert) that there won't be any > new OpenGL version for a long time, if ever. Will we be stuck at 14.x > forever? :) >
why not a new release bump after implementing those "OpenGL 2015" extensions ;) >> I'm updating docs/intro.html with version 10.x - 12.x info. >> >> -Brian >> >> _______________________________________________ >> mesa-dev mailing list >> mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org >> https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
