On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 3:31 AM, Dave Airlie <airl...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 30 September 2016 at 01:07, Jason Ekstrand <ja...@jlekstrand.net> wrote: >> On Sep 29, 2016 7:56 AM, "Emil Velikov" <emil.l.veli...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> On 28 September 2016 at 19:53, Marek Olšák <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Hi, >>> > >>> > It's been almost 4 months since the 12.0 branch was created, and soon >>> > it will have been 3 months since Mesa 12.0 was released. >>> > >>> > Is there any reason we haven't created the stable branch yet? >>> > >>> > Ideally, we would time the release so that it's 1-2 months before fall >>> > distribution releases. >>> > >>> >>> Thanks Marek ! >>> >>> In all honesty I was secretly hoping that we'll get Dave/Bas RADV for >>> 12.1. With the topic of which would be 'the default' Vulkan driver for >>> ATI/AMD hardware to be considered at a later stage. >> >> If they have even close to the amount of work we had to get it merged, I >> don't think that's at all realistic. Then again, Dave is the one who wants >> to have a Vulkan driver for AMD hardware that he can package and ship so >> I'll let him decide how badly he wants it in this release. >> >>> That said here are the tentative dates: >>> >>> Oct 7/14 2016 - Feature freeze/Release candidate 1 >>> Oct 14/21 2016 - Release candidate 2 >>> Oct 21/28 2016 - Release candidate 3/final release >>> >>> Fwiw I'm still in favour of getting RADV in even if it's not >>> perfect/feature complete. Devs, let me know if there's a "must have" >>> feature that we want in 12.1. > > The main problem I have with merging radv is the whole conformance testing > end of it. > > It's probably fine if I just make a big printf on device creation that RADV > isn't a conformant vulkan implementation yet. Sorta like what Intel do on the > older GPUs. > > Otherwise I don't think merging it is a big job, it's 30,000 lines of > standalone > code, I've already merged the prereq patches, and I think any code sharing > should happen in tree.
I think we also need to improve the configure.ac changes a bit before merging. I think I used the llvm version check before definition or something and haven't gotten around to fixing that yet. - Bas > > Dave. > _______________________________________________ > mesa-dev mailing list > mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org > https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev _______________________________________________ mesa-dev mailing list mesa-dev@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/mesa-dev
