[Admin note] Unless you are a representative of UCEPROTECT, or you have something to actually add to the discussion rather than endlessly nitting on statistics etc, please refrain from continuing this thread.
Over the years we've all seen many threads on many mailing lists of the form "$dnsbl_operator has practices I don't agree with and they've listed me". I can think of no threads that resulted in a change of operational policy on behalf of $dnsbl_operator. As mentioned up thread, many messages ago, using UCEPROTECT Level 3 to block outright is (to quote): > recommended only if you are a HARDLINER and you want to cause service > providers > and carriers that have spammer / abusive clients to be quickly and > effectively blocked > and it does not matter to you if regular email is also occasionally rejected. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Ethics aside, they are *very* clear about their policies in all regards. You may now resume normal service. Graeme (not in any way involved in, related to, knowing of or in fact a user of the aforementioned DNSBL provider) [/Admin note] _______________________________________________ mailop mailing list mailop@mailop.org https://list.mailop.org/listinfo/mailop
