----- Original Message -----
From: "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org>
To: "Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043
byphilehol...@googlemail.com)
"Phil Holmes" <em...@philholmes.net> writes:
----- Original Message -----
From: <d...@gnu.org>
To: <philehol...@googlemail.com>; <tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com>;
<em...@philholmes.net>; <m...@philholmes.net>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; <re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2014 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by
philehol...@googlemail.com)
On 2014/08/12 13:58:44, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
The problem is the other way round. incipit-width is not scaled
within the layout block, and so produces correct results for width.
I am not convinced that the results are "correct" when they are not
scaled the same as every other measure including "\mm". Have you tried
my proposal?
I repeat: have you tried my proposal of treating incipit-width exactly
the same as short-indent in scm/paper.scm?
And, for completeness, I can say: yes: I have just tried. The result is
that both the width of the overall incipit, and the width of the incipit
music, are too small. Like I said they would be.
The problem is not that incipit-width needs scaling down, but that indent
does not. As I said before.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
