>>> > Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:2651: an indication of how the >>> > initial rests and note of the original version >>> > notes >>> > >>> > https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/ >>> > >> >> >>> No - it should be "note". A standard incipit has all the rests >>> leading to the first note, but just the first note alone. >> >> Beg to differ. See for example >> >> <URL:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mensural_notation#mediaviewer/File:Josquin_Domine_ne_in_furore.svg>. >> It's usually the first bar or half bar, but enough that every voice has >> at least one actual note. >> >> https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/ > > > TBH I've sung from a lot of music with incipits and have never seen more > than one note: finding a sole example on Wikipedia from an author who does > not appear to have a username isn't categorical!
FWIW I've also sung a lot of music with incipits and I didn't gather that one single note would be standard; I've even seen full movements as incipit. if the sung music starts with a ligature, it's even impossible to have just one note as incipit. to me "note or notes" is just pleonasm for "notes". p _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel