----- Original Message -----
From: <tdanielsmu...@googlemail.com>
To: <philehol...@googlemail.com>; <d...@gnu.org>; <em...@philholmes.net>
Cc: <lilypond-devel@gnu.org>; <re...@codereview-hr.appspotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, August 16, 2014 9:38 PM
Subject: Re: Adds incipit section to NR (issue 108270043 by
philehol...@googlemail.com)
Minor typo, otherwise LGTM
Trevor
https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely
File Documentation/notation/ancient.itely (right):
https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/diff/40001/Documentation/notation/ancient.itely#newcode2651
Documentation/notation/ancient.itely:2651: an indication of how the
initial rests and note of the original version
notes
https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/
No - it should be "note". A standard incipit has all the rests leading to
the first note, but just the first note alone.
--
Phil Holmes
_______________________________________________
lilypond-devel mailing list
lilypond-devel@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel