On 2014/08/12 13:58:44, mail_philholmes.net wrote:
The problem is the other way round. incipit-width is not scaled
within the
layout block, and so produces correct results for width.
I am not convinced that the results are "correct" when they are not scaled the same as every other measure including "\mm". Have you tried my proposal?
indent and short-indent are scaled, and so produce widths that are too small for
the
desired output. Attached is a sample file that illustrates the
problem. No attachment here.
In it is a potential solution: using
scale-factor = #( / 1.0 (module-ref (current-module) 'mm) )
That would seem to be a satisfactory way of avoiding problems should
the way
scaling is done change in future?
I am skeptical. The main problem I see is that when inheriting a grob-layout as the start of a \layout block, then 3 will not be the same as 3\mm. We probably need a way to get at the unscaled layout, then scale afterwards. I would not want to _calculate_ the unscaled layout since that buys us a buildup of numerical errors. https://codereview.appspot.com/108270043/ _______________________________________________ lilypond-devel mailing list lilypond-devel@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-devel
