and before you say Strauss only got 7 in his last
game, well yes you are right and this is the problem
with Strauss being sat on his arse for the last few
weeks while Vaughan makes an attempt to discover how
to bat. It's a complete joke. 


--- Richard Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> > Rich, 
> > If you'd ever played cricket at any sort of decent
> > level, or, knowing you,
> > any level at all, then your opinion may be as
> valid
> > as mine.
> 
> Listen to you ! Ok, my cricketing cv consists of
> representing Colton (East Leeds) in the Leeds league
> at various levels. This was the same time as a
> certain
> Mr Blakey who still holds the record for 152 n.o. in
> a
> 20 overs Leeds league game. Shame his batting never
> really pushed on cos he looked the business at that
> level. 
> 
> > As we all well know that you are all talk and
> little
> > ability then your
> > opinion is worthless.
> 
> Ah Paul, you've let yourself down again. Bloody hell
> what a ridiculous statement. Mind you we've come to
> expect this rubbish from you. Afterall, he would
> have
> never get sacked before christmas would he paul ?
> Well I hope my cricketing credentials have convinced
> you that I am allowed to have a point of view but
> really how hard is it to see that Vaughan is a
> struggling captain ? As Oz Pete says - we managed to
> defeat the Aussies  and kiwis over in oz - now we
> look
> clueless with boy wonder in charge. Yes there have
> been examples of great captains with only limited
> cricketing ability - Brearly being one but Vaughan
> doens't fall into this category cos we can't win a
> match with him in charge. He is also opening our
> battting at the mo and is a complete embarrassment.
> Forget the ashes Paul, look to the last game and
> that
> makes Vaughan a very poor captain.
> 
> Bring him home and put Strauss in for the last 3
> games. 
>  
> 
> 
> --- Paul Cundell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > > 
> > > Another good innings against Australia. Of
> course
> > he
> > > was unlucky again wasn't he. Inspirational field
> > > placings - do me a favour - we lost and
> Pietersen
> > got
> > > 100.  He's our leg iron Paul. Bring him home
> now.
> > > 
> > > You know as much about cricket as footy Paul.
> > > 
> > Rich, 
> > If you'd ever played cricket at any sort of decent
> > level, or, knowing you,
> > any level at all, then your opinion may be as
> valid
> > as mine.
> > As we all well know that you are all talk and
> little
> > ability then your
> > opinion is worthless. If you fail to appreciate
> the
> > value of field placings
> > and the timing of bowler changes then you make it
> > perfectly clear that you
> > are a know nowt with a big gob.
> > Personally, I would rather play under a man
> manager
> > and tactician like
> > Vaughan than a hot head like Flintoff.
> > Try not to confuse the issues Rich. Whether
> Vaughan
> > warrants a place in the
> > team on his batting form alone is, of course,  a
> > resounding no. However you
> > are, as always, Mr 'act in haste and repent at
> > leisure' and want him
> > sacking, just as you wanted Blackwell sacking for
> > over 2 years. You don't
> > give a thought for who would replace him nor
> whether
> > they would do any
> > better. Do you recall Flintoff's dip in form
> whilst
> > captain for the Ashes?
> > Would you prefer a below par Flintoff in charge or
> a
> > below par Vaughan? I
> > know my choice but what is yours? You are always
> > quick to pull the trigger
> > but always slow to pin your colours on a viable
> > replacement. Get off the
> > fence Rich and tell us who would make a better
> > captain than Vaughan. 
> > Don't just say 'anyone' like you did for the Leeds
> > manager and then back
> > peddle to say that you didn't actually mean anyone
> > either, give us a
> > credible name.
> > Cheers
> > Paul
> > PS Is Wise still 'the man for me'?
> > PPS Did you ever play any sport, other than darts
> > and pool in the
> > commercial, outside of school?
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and
> > the list administrators accept no liability for
> the
> > personal views and opinions of contributors. 
> > Leedslist mailing list
> > [email protected]
> >
> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> > it's a God awful small affair
> > 
> 
> 
> 
>      
>
___________________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there
> knows the answer. Try it
> now.
> http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/ 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and
> the list administrators accept no liability for the
> personal views and opinions of contributors. 
> Leedslist mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> it's a God awful small affair
> 



      ___________________________________________________________
Yahoo! Answers - Got a question? Someone out there knows the answer. Try it
now.
http://uk.answers.yahoo.com/

_______________________________________________
the Leeds List is an unmoderated mailing list and the list administrators 
accept no liability for the personal views and opinions of contributors. 
Leedslist mailing list
[email protected]
http://list.zetnet.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
it's a God awful small affair

Reply via email to