> (snip reasoned statement that all Blackwell haters will consider shite The pro-Blackwell faction consistently backs up its opinions with
well-thought out arguments.
The key difference is the pro-Blackwellites appreciate the big picture and
appreciate the scale of the job he's had to do (his first manager's job.
remember) in unprecedented and almost impossibly difficult circumstances.
We also acknowledge Kevin's limitations - as a previous incumbent used
to say - he's just larnin'. We also didn't expect to win promotion last season
(and frankly, I don't 'expect' to win it this season either). He deserves his
chance, and if he screws up this season I've no doubt he'll be replaced.
The anti-Blackwell faction simply heaps its random frustrations at our
situation on to Blackwell, mixes in a load of tabloid rubbish and
half-understood facts, stirs in the belief that we somehow have a divine right
to be in the premiership and spews forth the same old toss over and over
again.
Mark
|
- Re: [LU] in ands outs Simon Austin
- Re: [LU] in ands outs Richard Walker
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Mark Humphries
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Richard Walker
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Mark Humphries
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Richard Walker
- Re: [LU] in ands outs Sean Emmott
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Sean Emmott
- Re: [LU] in ands outs Richard Walker
- Re: [LU] in ands outs MarkBursa
- RE: [LU] in ands outs David . Woolmer
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Mark Humphries
- RE: [LU] in ands outs David . Woolmer
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Mark Humphries
- RE: [LU] in ands outs David . Woolmer
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Mark Humphries
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Richard Walker
- RE: [LU] in ands outs Mark Humphries
- Re: [LU] in ands outs MarkBursa
- RE: [LU] in ands outs David . Woolmer

