On 05/15/2017 10:16 PM, Philip Prindeville wrote: >> On May 12, 2017, at 6:02 AM, Edwin van Drunen <ed...@vandrunen.net> wrote: >> >> I understand that the vote is done amongst the developers, the people >> actually running the project, this makes sense. >> But if the goal of the project is not only to keep yourself busy, but also >> to target a larger audience, it makes sense to base some decisions on >> "market research". >> The name is very important for user perception and influences the audience >> you will reach. > > > Maybe one person as the “user ombudsman” could be given a vote. > > I have no idea how such a person would be chosen, however. > > -Philip
An assigned vote might be a bit much. Mailing list banter like this could be useful advice, if it is observed carefully. A two-pass voting process with a comment period could help. Any organization should find a way to stay in touch with its patronage, whether its funds or volunteer labor. -Eric _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
