12.05.2017 23:45, Val Kulkov:
On 12 May 2017 at 17:40, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Val Kulkov wrote:
I should also note that it is extremely important to ask the right
question. You get what you ask for. Apparently, the developers voted
on this question: "Re-brand LEDE to OpenWrt?" (see the link above)
IMHO the question should have been "Should the merged project be
called OpenWrt?"
the vote was not "should lede be re-branded", it was "what should the merged
project be named"
David, please see the exact question here:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-adm/2017-March/000436.html
It might not be easy to get for people which were not involved in the
whole process, but let me assure you as a LEDE developer the question
was "what should the merged project be named". Anyway, thanks a lot for
explaining to use what we have voted about.
Because the issue is not whether to re-brand LEDE to OpenWrt, the
issue is the whether the merged project should retain the old name
that quite a few people consider to be tainted now.
yes, there are some people who hold very strong opinions on the topic, but
the vote was held and the majority voted for the name openwrt.
The majority? There was a tie. Please see the above link.
No it was a +1 for OpenWrt. What you are linking to was a (preliminary)
summary. The last vote about the topic was
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-adm/2017-March/000437.html,
which makes it +1. There were no more votes in the following two month.
Now that all ambiguities are cleared, everyone can go back to work
instead of writing/reading pointless mails.
Mathias
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
