The original post in this thread listed the remaining items to be
done/decided for a remerge.
David Lang
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Fernando Frediani wrote:
If the majority voted for the name OpenWRT what's the remaining issue then ?
Fernando
On 12 May 2017 23:40, "David Lang" <da...@lang.hm> wrote:
On Fri, 12 May 2017, Val Kulkov wrote:
I should also note that it is extremely important to ask the right
question. You get what you ask for. Apparently, the developers voted
on this question: "Re-brand LEDE to OpenWrt?" (see the link above)
IMHO the question should have been "Should the merged project be
called OpenWrt?"
the vote was not "should lede be re-branded", it was "what should the
merged project be named"
Because the issue is not whether to re-brand LEDE to OpenWrt, the
issue is the whether the merged project should retain the old name
that quite a few people consider to be tainted now.
yes, there are some people who hold very strong opinions on the topic, but
the vote was held and the majority voted for the name openwrt.
I hope that the developers who voted on the question "re-brand LEDE to
OpenWrt" should at least consider voting on "should the merged project
be called OpenWrt" before the final decision on the name of the merged
project is made.
they already voted on exactly that question.
David Lang
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
_______________________________________________
Lede-dev mailing list
Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
