Hi, >> OpenWRT better describes the wide range of specific system images >> built for COTS products (which are mostly wireless routers) and is >> a more suitable name for a final “product". You should consider >> maintaining the LEDE name or somehow differentiatie between the >> “development environment” and the "final product". > > I strongly agree here as well, I believe the "LEDE" project could > release an "OpenWrt" product in reasonable time intervals and that > should be targetting home routers and similar embedded systems.
Exactly this point has been brought up multiple times thorough the various talks but it appears that it did not gain much momentum. I would very much support such a model but am unclear on whether such an approach would be a viable option for the project members. ~ Jo _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
