On 12 May 2017 at 17:40, David Lang <da...@lang.hm> wrote: > On Fri, 12 May 2017, Val Kulkov wrote: > >> I should also note that it is extremely important to ask the right >> question. You get what you ask for. Apparently, the developers voted >> on this question: "Re-brand LEDE to OpenWrt?" (see the link above) >> IMHO the question should have been "Should the merged project be >> called OpenWrt?" > > > the vote was not "should lede be re-branded", it was "what should the merged > project be named" >
David, please see the exact question here: http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/lede-adm/2017-March/000436.html >> Because the issue is not whether to re-brand LEDE to OpenWrt, the >> issue is the whether the merged project should retain the old name >> that quite a few people consider to be tainted now. > > > yes, there are some people who hold very strong opinions on the topic, but > the vote was held and the majority voted for the name openwrt. The majority? There was a tie. Please see the above link. > >> I hope that the developers who voted on the question "re-brand LEDE to >> OpenWrt" should at least consider voting on "should the merged project >> be called OpenWrt" before the final decision on the name of the merged >> project is made. > > > they already voted on exactly that question. No. This is incorrect. Please see the above link. > > David Lang _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
