Deirdre Saoirse wrote:
>
> My point in listing this (other than personal embarrasment I suppose <g>)
> is to demonstrate my point: I left primarily for quality-of-life issues.
> In one case, it had nothing to do with the job itself. I really really
> love the company. I would work for them again in a heartbeat.
>
> So, I guess what I'm asserting is that, while paying women the same for
> the same job would be a start, it wouldn't GET or KEEP the women there as
> a whole, particularly if they're not treated well.
Heh. Are we saying here that men are more willing to accept bad treatment
than women are?
That women demand fair and honest treatment from their employers, and men
don't? Now isn't that interesting!
Jenn V.
--
"We're repairing the coolant loop of a nuclear fusion reactor.
This is women's work!"
Helix, Freefall. http://www.purrsia.com/freefall/
Jenn Vesperman [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.simegen.com/~jenn
************
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.linuxchix.org
