I see absolutely no issues with the visibility of votes, or the act of “lobbying” for someone’s vote.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Stanislav Malyshev <smalys...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi! >> This would block voting "lobbying" in various social channels based on >> possible >> outcomes, and would allow voting to run its course unaltered. The people > Why we want to block it? What's wrong in convincing people that your > idea is OK (or that it's not OK, for that matter)? Isn't it kind of the > whole point of discussing it? >> want to share their vote option, can still do that in the mailing list >> where some already >> justify their votes. > So now parallel to voting we get threads announcing everybody's votes. > Yay, more noise! > Or, even worse, given current tendencies, somebody submits a proposal, > couple of people say "yeah good idea", then vote happens and somehow > there's 30 "no" votes without any explanation - and without possibility > to fix it since by the time the proposer knows it the proposal is > already declined. It wouldn't be very encouraging to submit RFCs with > such process. > -- > Stas Malyshev > smalys...@gmail.com > -- > PHP Internals - PHP Runtime Development Mailing List > To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
