Hey wait. I didn't even say tunnel at all ;-)
I just said you can unfortunately not claim to be an Internet ISP and
not carry the whole bloody BGP routing table by just using LISP (unfortunately).
Aka: Joe touch pointed out that something like LISP (on-demand routing
information
if thats an appropriate classification in our context here) is part of overall
routing architecture (which i wholeheartedly agree), but its alas not a
sufficient
option to become an Internet ISP, and so i argued its not part of the "Internet
Architecture"
as it is reelevant to this doc.
Cheers
Toerless
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 03:10:47PM -0800, Dino Farinacci wrote:
> > Is LISP really part of the Internet Architecture ? I thought (unfortunately)
> > not. E.g.: i don't think i can become an Internet transit ISP without
> > participating
> > in the "native" BGP routing. "Hey, i don't want these gigantic BGP Internet
> > routing tables, and my customers don't need it. I just want do do LISP".
>
> LISP isn't really tunnels (if you look really really closely) but to quote
> Noel "Tunnels were never first class citizens of the Internet architecture".
> Take it for what's it worth.
>
> Dino
_______________________________________________
Int-area mailing list
Int-area@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
