But if LISP is running in CPE routers, the enterprise has a say on which paths are used to get to a destination EID. So I would argue the enterprise does have impact.
Dino > On Feb 28, 2022, at 12:49 PM, to...@strayalpha.com wrote: > > FWIW: > >> On Feb 28, 2022, at 9:46 AM, Toerless Eckert <t...@cs.fau.de> wrote: >> >> I just said you can unfortunately not claim to be an Internet ISP and >> not carry the whole bloody BGP routing table by just using LISP >> (unfortunately). >> >> Aka: Joe touch pointed out that something like LISP (on-demand routing >> information >> if thats an appropriate classification in our context here) is part of >> overall >> routing architecture (which i wholeheartedly agree), but its alas not a >> sufficient >> option to become an Internet ISP, and so i argued its not part of the >> "Internet Architecture" >> as it is reelevant to this doc. > > Agreed. This is a common misconception; LISP and ‘recursive routers’ (which > is what I’ve called them for two decades) hide routing from the core by > pushing the work to the edge of an enterprise (in an unscalable manner). But > they have no impact on how enterprises interconnect. > > So, to me at least, they ARE part of the Internet architecture, but don’t > replace the need for backbone routing. They just isolate it from pockets > under a single enterprise’s control. > > Joe _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
