> > >> On Feb 25, 2022, at 3:07 PM, Dino Farinacci <farina...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>> >>> We use all three in the Internet (longest prefix, ARP/LISP, and RIP/OSPF, >>> respectively). >> >> But we haven't used ML. Wonder what people think about that? > > Machine learning?
Yes. > As in the failed DARPA Intelligent Nets effort? I don't know. > If so, ARP is learning - just the simplest kind. Without name structure that > maps to network topology, there’s nothing else to learn. Yes, probably better than constand retraining ML models. > Or did you mean something else? > > Joe Use probabability to know which next-hops to use in a FIB entry. Start with a static topology baseline and then prune paths based on probablility of failure (typical links going up and down, nodes not reliable, etc). This is very high-level. And this is NOT SDN. All predications are done local to a router. Just like my phone and car do it for other types of applications/use-cases. Dino _______________________________________________ Int-area mailing list Int-area@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area