Hi Marek,
IMO we'll have to cleanup those few questions in my other
mail (from a few minutes ago), but other than that I fully
agree.
Remaining questions:
- Future hbzlib placement?
- gt*, rdd* separate or not? (IMO separate)
- What to do with hbmain* libs? Are they really necessary?
- Purpose of hbnulsys?
Finally, VERY important, but not strictly related to that:
Solving the obligatory inclusion of every LICENSE files
in every distribution (binary/source) we release.
We should investigate whether we must include any 3rd party
license texts. If the answer is yes, we must include these
as well (like LICENSE_PCRE.txt, LICENSE_ZLIB.txt) in both
binary and source distributions.
Brgds,
Viktor
On 2008.02.10., at 16:59, Marek Paliwoda wrote:
Marek Paliwoda wrote :
I investigated a problem a little bit more
It appears to me that introducing one common
static library will not collide with "1.0"
release because we can keep current separated
libs together with one common static lib for
say, next two releases, and encourage people
to switch to a common lib in that time. So the
transition would be quite smooth.
I guess it would be even resonable to introduce
one common static lib in an upcoming "1.0" release
to start that process immidiately.
--
Marek
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jozin z bazin! Ustaw jako dzwonek w Twoim telefonie Pobierz >>>
http://link.interia.pl/f1cfa
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
