Marek Paliwoda wrote:
There are some techincal differences. 1. On some system it will be hard (or impossible) to overload some subsystem using only libraries. F.e. nulrdd which should replaces whole RDD tree for applications which do not want to use any RDD releated code will not work if you will try to link sth like: gcc myapp.o -lnulrdd -lhrb because myapp.o has no reference to any symbols in nulrdd so nulrdd will be ignored and then all RDD code will be taken from hrb where such references will appear. Of course such situatios exist only in few linkers.Are you absolutly sure ? AFAIK there is *always* a reference to RDD code from VM. Otehrwise it would be possible to link an executable without *any* rdd library, which is IMO impossible. So yes, gcc myapp.o -lnulrdd -lhrb will work.
Or in case linker does not support rescan, a simple REQUEST NULRDD would certainly help and would be consistent with "Clipper rules". -- Marek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
